cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Will anyone miss the "Related" sidebar?

Breck_Carter
Participant
1,752

The "Related" sidebar appears when you display an existing question in SQLA. It contains a list of titles for other questions that the underlying software believes are related to this one... in other words, it is a "Related Questions" list.

I am going to get rid of the "Related" sidebar, unless I hear strong objections.

Here are my reasons:

(1) It's not a very useful list; personally, I have never used it, but... that's not the main reason...

(2) I believe the existence of that list on each question page is causing Google to generate false hits... it finds some matching text in the "Related" list and thinks the containing question is a match. You can read more about this topic here: http://sqlanywhere-forum.sap.com/questions/535/why-does-google-return-hits-based-on-the-list-of-rela...

Dumping the "Related" list won't solve all of Google's problems, but waving a dead chicken over the keyboard has not accomplished anything.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Breck_Carter
Participant

Ok, it's gone... we'll see what happens.

For the record, the following code was added to SQLA's <HEAD> section; the "related-questions" line is the one that's relevant to this discussion:

<style>
#bootstrap-module { display: none; }
#bootstrap-guide { display: none; }
#bootstrap-details-module { display: none; }
#related-questions { display: none; }
</style>
VolkerBarth
Contributor
0 Kudos

At the moment they still show up... (Firefox 3.6.2 if that matters)

VolkerBarth
Contributor
0 Kudos

...and your code is shown as the first line on each page. So I guess it is not set correctly - but don't ask me where or how it has to be coded - I don't have any experience with that.

VolkerBarth
Contributor
0 Kudos

@Breck: As display is a CSS property AFAIK, shouldn't it be put inside as .css file or inside a <style></style> block?

reimer_pods
Participant
0 Kudos

I don't see "Related Questions" anymore (FF 3.6.2). And it looks like opening a question is faster than before (at least 57 milliseconds) 😉

Breck_Carter
Participant
0 Kudos

You guys are quick... yes I forgot the style tags, I'm CSS-challenged, I still don't understand why I can't use <blink> 🙂

VolkerBarth
Contributor
0 Kudos

@Breck: Looks better - and google seems to return better results now (though I would not expect the indexed pages to be re-indexed in the interim). Glad you re-tagged - hope this site is doomed to be successful.