cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Settlement to AUC is showing wrong values

misrasuman1
Explorer
0 Kudos
151

During periodic settlement of WBS to AUC the settlement entries are not showing correct values and expected. The expected value of settlement should match with the Actual Balances for the current period 9 which is in CJI3 (Actual Cost Line-Item Report)

The settlement entries from WBS to AUC are behaving as below:

Cost booked on Level 5 WBS lets say is 100 dollars

AUC is at level 1 WBS

Running CJB2 and then running CJ88 settles the cost correctly to AUC with 100 dollars.

CJI3 shows correctly as the total cost of the project is 0

Original posting with debit/credit indicator as "D" and the settlement posting as "O"

When we reverse the settlement the cost comes back to AUC with a debit/credit indicator as "D"

1. Original journal entry + 100 dollar debit to WBS with Dr/Cr indicator "D"

2. Settlement entry - 100 dollar credit to WBS with Dr/Cr indicator "O"

3. Settlement Reversal + 100 dollar debit to WBS with Dr/Cr indicator "D"

When we settle again the cost is wrongly taken as + 200 dollar and is omitting the entry of the previous settlement. What can be the reason for this?

So every time we are reversing and settling the values again the cost is wrong and is piling up

 

marcio_blos
Participant
0 Kudos

The econd settlement period is the same of the settlement reversal? And the processing type?

View Entire Topic
Ken_Melching
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

Refer to this SAP Help for information on the difference between FUL and PER settlement.

https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_S4HANA_ON-PREMISE/5e23dc8fe9be4fd496f8ab556667ea05/9bf1ca4dcaba476ca99...

Is the Level 5 WBS settling directly to the AuC or via the Level 1 WBS?

misrasuman1
Explorer
0 Kudos
The level 5 is directly setting to the AUC in this case
misrasuman1
Explorer
0 Kudos
Just to correct my earlier statement the AUC is maintained in Level 5 in this case