on 2008 Nov 20 12:22 PM
Hello All,
I am having a scenario where i need to send an idoc of type orders from R/3 which needs to be converted to file.
I have already handled idocs scenario of type LS ,But in this scenario i have created a party
Where i have defined the below parameters
Agency scheme Name
BusinessService ALE#LI#LF customerNo
When i checked in tcode SXMB_MONI it is showing
receiver receiverscheme receiverAgency receiverService parameters as below
PartyName XIParty http://sap.com/xi/XI (receiverservice isempty)
as a result it is not able to determine the receiverAgrement and went into errors.
Can somebody guide me in this scenario.
One more problem am having is interface mapping not displaying in interface determination.
Edited by: rajesh kumar on Nov 20, 2008 1:23 PM
Edited by: rajesh kumar on Nov 20, 2008 1:24 PM
Make sure that you have not created any message interface for Idocs and you have used the Idoc name itself as the interface name. What is the exact error in sxmb_moni?
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
See the blog
and Check whether the receiver determination and interface determination objects are active in change lists tab. If they are not active, activate the objects.
Also check the if the receiver determination and interface determination objects are referenced to the same namespace or not. Sender and receiver interface objects should always refer to the same Namespace.
Thanks!
Hello All,
I tried all the above specified things but none of them helped me .
I tried another scenario too for type party there also the receiver service is not displaying when i checked in the logs through SXMB_MONI
My concern is do i need to specify adapter-specific identifers for receiving business service too.
As a result its throwing CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND Error
Can somebody throw light on this.
How exactly identifer will work?
Hello All,
I am able to solve the problem by creating a receiver determination with virtual communication channel box checked.
I just like to share the learnings from this exercise that if we are going to specify an alternative identifiers in the party we need to use a receiver agrement with the virtual communication channels box checked.
correct me if i am wrong.
Thanks to all.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
maybe this guide could help you:
Regards
Patrick
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
66 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.