on 08-30-2007 9:51 PM
HI ALL ,
I am trying to do multi mapping with out using BPM .I will get message from the sender and i need to send that to two different target system. I have defined the mapping in the IR . In ID i have created the configuration scenario and i have created the receiver determination .In receiver determination i have selected "EXTENDED" and when i select input help for mapping name it says "NO Object found". What else should i do get the mapping program here .
Regards,
Tarun.
Hey
if u have to branch out the messages based upon some conditions then use Xpath for this.
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
if there are no conditions,you simply want to send the complete message to two different receivers then just give two business systems (one each for the two receivers) in receiver determination.ofcourse u need interface determination and receiver CC for each of the receivers.
Thanx
Aamir
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Bhavesh,
I'm sorry but if he needs 2 different receivers, then it's not the case of using Enhanced Interface Determination.
sapuser,
if you scenario is asynchronous, then it's easily implemented.
But it won't be achieved with multimapping.
You'll have 2 receivers in receiver determination (normal RD, not enhanced). For each of those, you'll have to create a separate simple mapping (that will generate the message expected at each receiver system) and refer that mapping in the interface determination of each receiver.
For example, you have input_message containing data1 and data 2. You'll have 2 simple mappings (not a multimapping), 1 generating output_message_1 containing data1 and the other generating output_message_2 containing data2. Then refer those mappings in the proper interface determinations.
Regards,
Henrique.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You need to do a Enhanced Interface Determination and not a Enhanced Receiver Determination.
The Receiver determination will be the standard receiver determination,
Regards
Bhavesh
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
96 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.