cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Is SHA256 the fastest choice for calling HASH() in SQL Anywhere 12?

Breck_Carter
Participant
1,756

The numbers shown at Crypto++ 5.6.0 Benchmarks seem to indicate that SHA256 is the fastest of the choices available with SQL Anywhere 12's HASH function... is that true? (there is occasionally a [cough] gap [cough] 'twixt theory and practice)

I'm interested in raw speed for computing string fingerprints, not cryptographic strength.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

0 Kudos

I think CRC32 ought to be fastest, then MD5. (I'm not quite sure what the columns are in that benchmark table, but it looks to me like they are confirming this.)

Breck_Carter
Participant
0 Kudos

I think you're right, SHA256 is the slowest, not the fastest.