Is it possible to re-release a transport?

[Former Member]

Hello!

I made a stupid mistake and imported 3 transports into the productive environment in the wrong order. Is there a way to import them again in the opposite order? Right now it says "already imported"...

kind regards, Peter

[Former Member]

Hi, folks

About re-release a transport request again, you can change field "TRSTATUS" in table "E070". When a change request has a value "D" in this field, this change request is in "modifiable" status. You have to change the change request and all subsequent taks in it.

Best regards,

[Former Member]

@Sergio think that is a pretty bad idea to modify tables to re-release a transport.

Just create a new one, and include the objects of the other 3 transports. - Release it - finished.

You only have to take care the the objects were not modified in the meantime. (You will release the current dev version)

That would be the smoothest way.

Kind Regards

another Peter

[tomas_black]

Hello Peter,

If the requests are already imported and you did not chose U0 (unconditional mode 0 - which means that you'll see the "already imported" in STMS) then you will have to add the transport to the buffer again using command "tp addtobuffer...". It will add to the end of the buffer though.

Please check the following link for the syntaxes of tp command:

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/3d/ad5b744ebc11d182bf0000e829fbfe/content.htm

Best regards,

Tomas Black

[Former Member]

Yes, you delete these transport from the queue and add them to the queue again.. Now you can import them again in the correct order.

Kind regards,

Mark

[Former Member]

Hi Mark,

AFAIK, re-import using STMS is only possible if the previous import tick the checkbox "Leave the request to be imported again". Other than that, manual operation have to be performed. Am I right?

About re-release transport, never heard of that. What we usually do is creating a copy of a request then release it again.

Thanks

[Former Member]

1. You are right!

2. No, that's not possible, indeed..

Kind regards,

Mark