HR Data Destruction Issue for Retiree Employee (status 2)

[rahul_gupta08]

Hello Experts,

We have encountered with an error while destructing the retiree employees (employment status: 2). Rules and policies are configured as enclosed and status is live. It works for withdrawn employee (employment status: 0) with same configurations.

Has anyone come across with such issues? rules-created.png

[rahul_gupta08]

dharshan.a Do you have any idea why are we getting this issue?

[rahul_gupta08]

Hi,

Update to this issue:

• 'From the retention rule It is referring to the leaving date. But the employee who is giving the error message does not have any leaving date as he is in status '2' which means he is a retiree.
• If the employee has left the company he can only have employment status '0'. In all other employment status he is still in the company and thus can't have any leaving date.
• 'If the employee has left the company he can only have employment status '0'.
• The meaning of the different employment status is not country specific but international and has the same meaning for every country in SAP. Thus: 2: Employee with company, but as retiree
• When referring to the documentation of the employment status , find the following information:

0: Employee not with company

1: Employee with company, but inactive

2: Employee with company, but as retiree

3: Employee active in company

So if anyone wants to delete the retiree employee can't do since SAP doesn't have option to do so.

BR,

Rahul

[former_member289103]

Hi Rahul,

This is a interesting scenario. If the leaving date is not filled, then you need to have a date in mind from which you can calculate the +X years. This needs to come from the rule definition outside the system first.

If the retention date is , for example, Creation date + X Years, then you can still go ahead and create the rule with creation date for status 2 records.

If you have a specific date ( say "current date" + X years ) in mind, then implement the Indirect Start time reference BADI by passing any date as dummy and in the BADI you can output "current date" to the ILM framework to derive the Retention time.

If the start date itself is unknown " ??? + X years ", then i would say the rule needs to derived for such cases first.

Baseline, if you have a rule defined properly for Status 2 records, then we can use ILM rules to model accordingly.

Are you implying that " Leaving date" is the only plausible option even for Retired employees ?

Thanks and Regards,

Dharshan A