on 2016 May 31 10:41 AM
hi folks, I am considering full encryption of one of my databases, and wanted to understand how to assess performance impact of full db vs (specific) table only encryption. Is there a recommended approach to assess performance degradation?
thanks much for any thoughts, Cosmin
Request clarification before answering.
I do not know whether that will help, but here's a snippet from the (older) whitepaper "Securing SQL Anywhere Server 10", page 27 - I would think the relative overhead should be similar for newer versions and hardware, but as usually YMMV:
Performance analysis
Performance is only slightly impacted when data is encrypted because SQL Anywhere is very efficient in encrypting/decrypting data. In lab tests, when databases are encrypted with AES or AES_FIPS, the performance decrease is between 2-3% on data retrievals and as much as 5% on data insertion. These results are based on the insertion/retrieval of 2.5 million rows to and from a single table on a Pentium 4 2.4 GHz system with 1024 MB RAM.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
53 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.