on 2014 May 06 8:20 AM
Hello,
I need to install an addon in a system with MSSQL 2012.In note 1676665 -Setting up Microsoft SQL Server 2012, explains that:
Be aware of the following:
a) Do not apply the SPAM update manually. The SPAM update is part of the stack that will be used by the SUM Tool.> Done.
b) Use the SUM tool to apply the required support package stack. The tool has specific fixes and workarounds that are needed for the support package application on SQL Server 2012. >Done.
After that Could I install the addon directly via tcode Saint or I must to do it with SUM?
Hi Ruben
Yes you can use either one, better you can use the SUM tool
BR
SS
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
The addon is ST-A/PI for netweaver 7.31 SP10, and this addon has two patches.
Then is correctly If I install the addon from saint in one system with MSSQL 2012?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Whether or not you must use SUM or can use SAINT to install an add-on depends mostly upon the add-on and, possibly, the support pack levels involved. Which add-on is it? What is the NetWeaver release of your system? What support pack stack level are you currently at?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I am not quite sure why you are quoting the stack documentation when you say you want to install a new add-on.
If you have to apply a newer support package stack before installing the add-on, then, yes, I would let SUM do the SPAM/SAINT update as well.
If you don't need to apply a newer SPS, then you can import the SPAM/SAINT update without SUM.
Either way you can install a new add-on via SAINT and should make sure to have the latest SPAM/SAINT update installed.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
62 | |
9 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.