on 2008 Apr 28 11:27 AM
Hello Friends,
I need some help about this mapping issue.
input file :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
<SOAP:Body>
<Object_1>
<ID>12222333444</ID>
<points>50</points>
</Object_1>
<Object_1>
<ID>12222333555</ID>
<points>20</points>
</Object_1>
<Object_1>
<ID>1222233777</ID>
<points>10</points>
</Object_1>
</SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
output file1 :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
<SOAP:Body>
<Object_1>
<ID>12222333444</ID>
<points>50</points>
</Object_1>
</SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
output file 2 :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
<SOAP:Body>
<Object_1>
<ID>12222333555</ID>
<points>20</points>
</Object_1>
</SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
output file 3 :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
<SOAP:Body>
<Object_1>
<ID>1222233777</ID>
<points>10</points>
</Object_1>
</SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
Best regards,
FK
Hi,
Multi-mapping and BPM (integration process) always use to go hand-in-hand. Since SPS14, this isnt true anymore. In the case of message splits (1:n transformations), multi-mappings can now be created and used in non-BPM scenarios. Referred to in many different ways, but most commonly as mapping-based message splits, this new enhancement affords SAP NetWeaver XI developers an opportunity to take BPM out of the equation for message split based scenarios.
Have a look into this weblog
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards
Aashish Sinha
PS : reward points if helpful
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Can anyone help me out in answering these question asap?
I forgot this weblog :
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
but on step - Interface determination, i cannot select any Interface mappings.
https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/weblogs/images/251688284/ID_ReceiverDetermination.JPG
Many thanks in advance,
FK
> but on step - Interface determination, i cannot select any Interface mappings.
> https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/weblogs/images/251688284/ID_ReceiverDetermination.JPG
Hi,
After Createing the Receiver Determination, when you create the Interface Determination then select the radio button "Enhanced" and select the Interface mapping first, as soon as you select the Interface mapping your message interfaces will be automatically added in the Interface determination.
Regards,
Sarvesh
I think you have not followed the blog properly for your requirement.
for example: Source File is like this.
<Records>
<FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
<LastName>Singh</LastName>
<Dept>SAP</Dept>
<EmpID>12345</EmpID>
<Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
<Experience>5 years</Experience>
</Records>
'N' Target Structure are
<Records>
<EmpName>
<FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
<LastName>Singh</LastName>
</EmpName>
</Records>
<Records>
<EmpDetail>
<Dept>SAP</Dept>
<EmpID>12345</EmpID>
<Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
<Experience>5 years</Experience>
<EmpDetail>
</Records>
So if you think your requirement is as per the above examples then follow /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible blog.
Regards,
Sarvesh
In addition to experts advice I would like to add that you will also require SplitByValue (on Value Change) in your mapping.
What you can do is.. Remove the context of your ID field and then map -
> SplitByValue(on Value Change) -
> Target field(this will create new files based on change in ID)
I hope it helps..
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Faith ,
Use Split By Value..
Go through this link.
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Thanks,
Satya Kumar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Fatih Kökce,
following blog may help u-
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
BestRegards,
Ramesh.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
66 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
8 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.