on 2015 Oct 13 9:26 PM
Hi all,
I come to share with you that the following notes were launched carrying the legal changes for 1099 and 1042-S forms relevant for tax year 2015:
2227185 - US Legal Change 2015 - 1099 and 1042 Smartforms and Adobe Forms
2227186 - US Legal Change 2015 - 1099 and 1042 Smartforms and Adobe Forms
The notes contain the same content, the difference is that each note is relevant for certain support package versions. Note 2227185 is relevant for release 600 and above and note 2227186 is relevant for releases 470 and 500.
Regards,
Ester
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Sanjiv and Bhanu,
its good to know that I am not the only one in such situation.
I would like to share the way I solved this problem
The pre requisite notes are definitely needed I tried without them but got a error because new form for 2015 uses the fields which were added in those previous notes for 2014.
But we don't have to implement all the notes most of the notes have changes for 1099 as well as 1042 in same note.
We are using only 1099 and not 1042 so I implemented only the parts of the notes for 1099 form.
There are manual changes in structures in these notes and I did those manual changes only for form 1099 and it worked.
This is what I did:
1 - Imported images and smartforms for 1099 as per NOTE - 2227185
2 - did table definition change for IDWTPARTNERADD_US NOTE 2227185
3 - applied SAP note 2094639.
Regards,
Parag
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Sanjiv,
For autocorrection notes we have to apply it fully, when I said I applied part pertaining only to 1099 it was for the manual steps for table definitions.
I already mentioned all the steps I did in my previous reply. Steps 1,2 are manual so did them only for 1099. Step three has auto correction note so applied that completely.
The Auto correction Notes change the code for smartforms so I don't mind them changing code for 1042 form as well since we are not using it anyway.
But I didn't wanted to do any manual changes with structures for 1042 as that structure is used at lot of other places too in our system and might have affected those other programs.
I hope that solves your doubts, reward points if helpful.
Regards,
Parag
User | Count |
---|---|
117 | |
8 | |
7 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.