Unrestricted stock in storage locations for maintenance orders using fiori apps

[DavidAvila]

Hello Experts!

We are implementing the corrective maintenance process (BH1) in S/4HANA Cloud, Private Edition, and are aiming to manage everything through Fiori apps. During testing, we encountered an issue: when a maintenance order consumes a material that is out of stock in any storage location, the system allows the process to proceed without showing any error or message in the Fiori app (Create/Change Maintenance Order).

For example, when performing the same process in the SAP GUI transaction (IW31/IW32), the system displays the unrestricted-use stock as a field in the storage location search help, as shown below:

However, when we open the storage location search help in the Fiori app, the stock information is not available:

We would like to know if there is a similar functionality that allows us to view unrestricted-use stock in specific storage locations, similar to the SAP GUI, or if there is an option to activate a warning message. Alternatively, is it possible to extend the search help functionality in the Fiori app to add the stock fields using ABAP code ?

Thank you in advance for your help and best regards!

[sapdude]

Hello David,
If you are talking about Spare Parts Consumption (movement 261) check out the Fiori App 'Perform Maintenance Jobs'.
Once work order is planned, spare parts are assigned - you can book consumption there, and if there is no stock - u got an error straight in the app.

However, if you mean, that you want to see the unrestricted stock during planning, during spare parts assignment - most probably u need a small development.
On the other side it's a bit tricky. 
It's not about planning work and using spare parts which are on the stock.
It's about assigning the right spare parts, and if there is no stock - buying them.

Have a look at the app and let me know what u think.
Cheers,
Dan

[DavidAvila]

Hi,

You're right; our need is to view the stock information at the planning level. However, after checking the app, we found that it has very useful functionalities, so I believe we will proceed with the standard version.

Thank you for the clarification.

Best regards,

David Avila