stock transfer from plant to plant

[Former Member]

A material ACID of 1000 liters is transferred from plant 1000 to plant 1100 with in same company code using stock transfer order. while transferring 50 liters got evaporated. when it reaches plant 1100 the net qty will be 950 liters only. For how much qty will plant 1100 make the GR. How we should map and proceed further in dis scenario of stock transfer from plant to plant ?

regards

suman

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

you have to close this STO process by performing the GR at the receiving side and then goods issue the 50 kg as a shortage / shrinkage charge to a cost center defined by your FI team.

[Former Member]

Hi,

Here who will own this qty which is lost during transit , since its intra STO , both plants are of same company code. Then you need to check if supplying plant can book it back to scrap , thn you need to receive full qty and return back lost qty from receiving plant.

Here problem is if you post GR for the qty which is recieved it will not match goods issued and recieved qty , and leave the qty in stock intransit. Which creates problem in reconcillation.

If receiving plant can book it to scrap , you can post lost qty to scrap. It entirely depends on which plant will scrap it.

[Former Member]

Our method is to have a specific storage location created for these 'disputable' stock - to charge to whose account decided by business later, say 0002, then GR 1000L in plant 1100 storage location 0001, then either a 'reverse STO' create by Z program (GR) automatically or manually send 50L back to plant 1000 storage location 0002, this will be 'cleared' by physical inventory or scrap etc.

Hope it's helpful.

[satishbabu_bodepudi]

Hi suman,

Try with below steps

1.Create a vendor master and assign supplying plant

2.Create a recursive BOM for material by giving same material code in components and quantity 0.95 per 1 unit. Also select material provided by vendor

3.Create sub contracting po with this vendor.

4.Then do GI GR

<removed by moderator>

Message was edited by: Jürgen L