on 2012 Feb 15 2:31 PM
Hello Experts
I have just performed a CUUC (Upgrade along with unicode conversion) from R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0 EHP5. The data size that i earlier had was close to 463 GB (MSSQL MDF, LDF Files), after the data export to be converted to unicode the size was 45 GB (10% of actual data size, i feel this is normal after heterogeneous system copy), but after the import again the DATA file size is only 247 GB, is this normal ? or have i lost some data ? For ex, I tried checking tables like MSEG and the number of entries have reduced from 15,678,790 to 15,290,545.
Could you kindly let me know if there is a way to check from Basis perspective if i have not lost any data ? I have followed all the procedures as per SAP Standards.
Waiting for your quick reply.
Best Regards
Pritish
Hi Pritish,
did you compare SAP ECC 6.0 (Non-Unicode) with SAP ECC 6.0 (Unicode) ?
did you also check the numbers which can be found in the TOC files ?
Best regards,
Nils Buerckel
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Pratish,
Table entries before export should be either equal or more after the import.As long as export and import have been
completed successfully its ok. However since you have a question in mind that table entries after the import are less when
compared before i would consider redoing the export and import again.
Its always a good idea to get the table entries for around 100-150 tables before export and then compare them post import.
Regards,
Ershad Ahmed.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Is normal that you Database will getting smaller after import, as reorganization will perform during export/import. Also, if you are using MSSQL server 2008, there's a data compression feature enabled.
refer to:
Note 1488135 - Database compression for SQL Server
Note 1505884 - R3load: compression for table / index
Hope it helps,
Cheers,
Nicholas Chang
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Nicholas
Data is compressed during the new R3load procedure is understood, but why number of table entries have reduced is something which is still a question to me (in some cases increased as well) ? For example
Source Target
STPO 415,725 412,150
STKO 126,710 126,141
PLAF 74,671 78,336
MDKP 193,487 192,747
MDPB 55,329 63,557
Any suggestions or ideas ?
Best Regards
Pritish
User | Count |
---|---|
106 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.