cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Relationship for Time Confirmation

Former Member
0 Kudos
169

Hello

I have been doing some searching on the topic of Auto-Time Confirmation for PM orders.

I have been seeing discussions on mile stones and sub operations for Production Orders where time confirming  one operation will auto confirm another.

However I am no nearer to finding my answer.

I am planning to create  a PM work order and want to assign  People and a Machine resource to the job.

One Example would be for  Road Maintenance

RWC's

Op.0010      PN**-P01 - Operator x 1 for 12hours

Op.0011      SN**-T01 - Grader  x 1 for 12hours

I want to do this so I can plan the capacity for both our operators (as our operators are multi skilled and can be used on different machines) along with being able display and plan to the machine availability.

This however will double the time confirmations required for each job.

In this scenario I am hoping that  if Op 0011 has been time confirmed for 12hours, then Op 0010 will automatically be time confirmed for 12 hours.

Another Example may look like this;

RWCs:-

PN**-P01 - Operator  (capacity is 8 per shift)

SN**-T01 - Grader (capacity is 2 per shift)

SN**-T02 - Water Cart (capacity is 1 per shift)

SN**-T03 - Profiling Excavator (Capacity is 1 per shift)

Work Order Operations:-

0010 - PN**-P01 - Grade Road - 1 - 6hrs

0011 - SN**-T01 - Grade Road - 1 - 6hrs

0020 - PN**-P01 -Execute Road Watering - 1 - 2hrs

0021 - SN**-T02 - Execute Road Watering 1 - 2hrs

0030 - PN**-P01 - Repair Bunding - 1 - 6hrs

0031 - SN**-T03 - Repair Bunding - 1 - 6hrs

I would want to have some relationship with Op 10 & Op11 so when one is time confirmed the other is auto confirmed also.

just the same as Op 20 & 21, 30&31.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

jogeswararao_kavala
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Matthew,

  • Yours is a complex requirement for a user-exit. ABAPers (if you are not one) need to do some research and experimentation with few available exits or BAdis.
  • BAdi like WORKORDER_CONFIRM, WORKORDER_UPDATE  could be of use..
  • If we use CONFPM05 and write a code to confirm op 0011 (using some Function module OR Batch input lines) while saving op 0010, it might throw an error that the Order is locked by the sy-uname. But first you should try this.
  • Please have a look at exits CONF0001, CONFPM01, CONFPM02, CONFPM03, CONFPM04 also because while deriving your solution the ABAPer might need few of them.
  • The research if has t continue beyond user-exits and BAdis, then Implicit enhancement Points in program SAPLCORU also should be explored.
  • Queries which do not have simple technical solutions could only be assisted by receiving information about relevant Enhancements.

Good luck

KJogeswaraRao

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Mathew,

Try using an exit CONFPM05.

Here you need an expert ABAP'er to write a code for you to check

If confirmation is being carried out on UVORN then program should fetch its VORNR & confirm main operation ( VORNR) along with UVORN.

Regards

Amol