cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Multiple company codes for line items

Former Member
0 Kudos
305

Hi Guys,

I am facing an issue where the system is allowing to enter objects like CC, plants from a different company code at header level in the PO. I mean although the comp code at header is x the system allows plants and cc in account assignment and derives another company code and allows to create the PO. Any ideas where to change this setting?

Regards,

Sid

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

Do you mean to say from account assignment per say Cost Center,system is deriving another company code?

Plz clarify.

Cheers

Former Member
0 Kudos

That is correct when i give Acc assignment cat K item category D and a plant assigned to another company code than the header company code, in account assinment it determined other company code and allows to create the PO

Former Member
0 Kudos

Okay let me put it this way...

Suppose we are creating a PO for company code X

Can the plant entered for line item in PO belong to a different company code. Is there a setting in system which allows are disallows this?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

Yes this is possible use Cross company code configuration

Vivek

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Guys,

I found that we can configure message 06 167 as error to resolve this. Anyone has any idea where we can do this?

Also can u give me the table where i can check for changes in settings for this message.

Thanks in advance

Sid

Former Member
0 Kudos

Go to SPRO>MM>Pur>Environment>Attributes of System Messages

Here change the message into Error.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi all

I have the same issue. Here the users are mentioned the Diffferenet company SO at PO Comparing with Material & POrg in account assignment field.

To avoiding this we can make error setting if the account assignment is different co code 06 167. But i have another one doubt incase If the SO is assigned with Same Co code and different plant, what will be the solution ?

Answers (0)