cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Form16 Error in Gross Emoulment Value

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi SAP Guru's,

Please help me to solve the problem of Form 16 , Gross Emolument Total coming in Annexure of Form No.16 on page no 4 is not coming correct rest values coming under emoulment head and perks head is correct but the total is not correct.

Below is the form 16 statement for a employee after Jan 2012

Emoluments paid

-


-


-


-


--

Basic Salary 1054500.00

House Rent Allowance 632700.00

Leave Travel Allowance 150600.00

Bonus 835931.00

Leave Encashment 123025.00

Corporate Attaire 45830.00

Other Deductions -900.00

-


-


-


-


--

Perks

-


-


-


-


--

Cars/Other automotive 32400.00

Interest free or concessional loans 145.62

Gifts, vouchers etc. 2500.00

Use of movable assets by employees 16070.30

Value of any other benefit/amenity/service/privilege 58175.00

-


-


-


-


Gross emoluments 3255045.42

But after manual calculation Gross emoluments is coming Rs 3,297,403

So there is a difference of Rs 42,358 .

what may be the reason?

Please help me solve the problem.

Thanks

Pooja

Edited by: prkcms on Feb 10, 2012 7:04 AM

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Pooja,

The value of Gross Emoluments is taken from /416 of the RT of the pernr. Please check the various components that are being added to /416. Make sure if all the values are being added in the /416 of the employee as gross salary is taken from the /416 of the RT. In the annexure you can print the same in the different heads through evaluation class setting.

Annexure to Form No.16

This function prints the detailed amounts for the following income and

tax components:

-Emoluments Paid

-Perks

-Income from Other Sources

-Exemptions u/s 10

Each of the above four components are assigned to an Evaluation Class:

1.Emoluments Paid is assigned to the Evaluation Class 6.

2.Perks is assigned to the Evaluation Class 9.

3.Income from Other Sources is assigned to the Evaluation Class 8.

4.Exemptions u/s 10 is assigned to the Evaluation Class 7.

Each of the sub components is assigned to a Specification of the Evaluation Class. For example, Basic Salary under the component Emoluments Paid is assigned to Specification 1 of EvaluationClass 6.

You can assign wage types to a particular Specification of an Evaluation Class, example, the Basic Salary wage types, MB10 and MB1F to Specification 1 of Evaluation Class 6. The amounts assigned to MB10 and MB1F, for an employee, are printed against Basic Salary, in this report.

Similarly, you can assign other wage types to the relevant specification Once the wage types are configured, as mentioned above,the break up will be available in form 16 annexure.

Regards,

Nishtha

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi

Thanks for responding.

But this is coming is coming correct rest employees it gives error for only 10 employees .

All values under Emolument and perks are coming correct as per RT table calculation only difference is in Gross Emolument .If problem is with Evaluation Class than other values also reflected as per my knowledge .

Why the difference is coming in Total .could you please explain little bit more..

Thanks

Pooja

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Pooja,

You need to check if /416 in the payroll is correct or not for these employees. You can check this by checking the /124, /125 & /127 for each month. And if your /416 is correct then you need to check the components which are forming this amount.

If you /416 itself is incorrect then you need to check from where /416 is getting created. Because it looks like that there is a wagetype for which evaluation class 6 is maintained but that wagetype is not getting added in the Gross salary in the payroll.

Please confirm if the Gross salary of the employee in the payroll is correct or the value in the annexure is correct?

Regards,

Nishtha

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi...

Just do a simple analysis..which are d additional wagetypes used for those 10 employees when compare to others and check out those WTs' evaluation class...

further check out EV of, if there are any exemption wagetypes u created and used in schema..

if u still dont find any clue...other options, u need to checkout the evaluation class of all wage types present in the table v_512w_d..

we hv also faced similiar issue and solved it this way only..

rgds, saravanan

Edited by: Saravanan V on Feb 15, 2012 12:03 PM