cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

error no 83

Former Member
0 Kudos

No entry in table $ for key $ T555F E65483

Error entry no. 83

A complex application error has occurred.

i have seen all the threads , like they are telling about organizational reassignment, but i haven't done the org reassignment.

(ii) and also all are telling about groupings , i rechecked everything i haven't done a mistake in that groupings,

so please help me what i have to do , i am waiting for response please.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

Table T555F contains the texts for errors which can occur during time evaluation, as defined in table T555E.

check table V_001P_ALL here check TRec field value what you have maintained..the same value should be there in T559L second PSgrouping field..(Personal Subarea Grouping for Time Recording)

and

Please go to SM34 and enter the table name as VC_PT_TMW_WORKLIST and go to maintain.Now check the error number with your PSG.Then you will come to know weather it is a techinical error or Customizing error

try this and let us know

regards,

mohammed

Edited by: 0mohammed1 on Oct 17, 2011 1:52 PM

Edited by: 0mohammed1 on Oct 17, 2011 1:53 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

thanks for the replay .

As u told i went to sm34 and i created on my grouping , a complex error went off , still i am getting error 83 ,before it was working very well , now only the problem happened pleas help me .

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Rameshwar,

what i said

Please go to SM34 and enter the table name as VC_PT_TMW_WORKLIST and go to maintain.

Now check the error number with your PSG grouping .

Then you will come to know weather it is a techinical error or Customizing error

if its a Customizing error then you easily find out the solution.

regards,

mohammed

Former Member
0 Kudos

I went to sm34 and i have done everything what u told ,still i am getting error

Error entry no. 83 Error when creating absence quota.

Former Member
0 Kudos

i forgot to tell , it is not giving anything like technical or cust error

Former Member
0 Kudos

01 4 83 Error when creating absence quota TECH Technical Errors

like this you will see msg. any one msg you will find.

regards,

mohammed

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI

ABOUT ERROR 83.

I DELETED ABSENCE QUOTA AND AGAIN I CREATED . WHICH I AM GETTING A COMPLEX ERROR (83). ABSENCE QUOTA GETTING GENERATED IN TIME EVAL , I HAVE DONE SAME THING FOR ANOTHER QUOTA , SAME ERROR I AM GETTING FOR THAT QUOTA. I AM NOT UNDERSTANDING THIS PLZ HELP ME.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Rameshwar,

please tell me for what dates you are generating two quotas.

and let me know your control record dates now.

regards,

mohammed

Former Member
0 Kudos

employee hired on 01.01.2011 , and i am generating the quotas through time evaluation . i deleted payroll results of that particular personnel number , and i deleted all the records of cluster b2 through the report RPUP2D10 , STILL I AM NOT GETTING.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Rameshwar,,

please check your CONTROL RECORD date and when you are running the TIME EVALUATION.

if control record date is Earlier to the date you are running time evaluation then you will get the error:83

so i suggest you to run the time evaluation according to the control record date and check the result of time evaluation.

let us know the same.

regards,

mohammed

Former Member
0 Kudos

DEAR MOHAMMED

thanks for your answer , I am getting , one more problem is in the first date of time evaluation 01.01.2011(SATUR DAY)

BASE ENTITLEMENT IS 22 DAYS

ABWKNOTI 200 DAYS

QTACC 200.08219 DAYS (200+0.08219)

02.01.2011 (SUNDAY )

ABWKNOTI 200.16438

QTACC 0.08219

WHY IT IS COMMING 200 DAYS .

PLZ HELP ME OUT.

Edited by: rameshsemar on Oct 24, 2011 1:04 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear Rameshwar,

check the table V_T559E here you might have selected the Radio button Accrual period.

instead Accrual period select the Radio button Calendar Year.

if it is prorata base then you have to select the Accrual period and in constant field you have to give the per day value.

Regards,

mohammed

Former Member
0 Kudos

DEAR MOHAMMED

FOR OTHER EMPLOYEE UNDER SAME GROUP QUOTA IS GENERATING CORRECTLY , FOR ONE PARTICULAR EMPLOYEE ONLY I AM GETTING ERROR, FOR OTHERS IT IS OKAY.

I AM GENERATED QUOTA THROUGH TIME EVALUATION FOR *+01.01.2011 TO 31.01.2011+*

Table ABWKONTI

Type From To Number Used Time unit

01 01.01.2011 01.01.2011 202.54789 0.00000 Days

02 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 1.86837 0.00000 Days

03 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 1.01928 0.00000 Days

TABLE QTACC

Generation AbsQType Name Operation Generated Accrued Transferred

31.01.2011 02 REDDY sick leave + 0.06027 0.00000 0.06027

31.01.2011 03 REDDY previligeleave + 0.03288 0.00000 0.03288

31.01.2011 01 REDDY casual leave + 0.08219 0.00000 0.08219

01.02.2011 TO 28.02.2011

Table ABWKONTI

Type From To Number Used Time unit

01 01.01.2011 01.01.2011 202.54789 0.00000 Days

02 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 1.92864 0.00000 Days

03 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 1.05216 0.00000 Days

01 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 0.08219 0.00000 Days

01 IT IS COMMING TWO TIMES.

Table QTACC (HERE IT IS CORRECT).

Generation AbsQType Name Operation Generated Accrued Transferred

01.02.2011 02 REDDY sick leave + 0.06027 0.00000 0.06027

01.02.2011 03 REDDY previligeleave + 0.03288 0.00000 0.03288

01.02.2011 01 REDDY casual leave + 0.08219 0.00000 0.08219

GIVE ME THE SOLUTION.

Edited by: rameshsemar on Oct 24, 2011 1:50 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

check the quota over view (PT50) for that employee.

if the quota is there with value 202 then delete that record from IT-2006 and then try run the time evaluation.

let us know the result,

Regards,

mohammed

Former Member
0 Kudos

DEAR MOHAMMED

IT IS THERE IN PT50 AND P2006 ALSO, WHAT SHOULD I DO?

AND AGAIN I TRIED WITH TIME EVALUATION SAME THING IS HAPPENED.

IN 2006 IT IS COMMING LIKE

01.01.2011 01.01.2011 01 REDDY casual leave 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 202.54789 0.00000

01.01.2011 31.12.2011 01 REDDY casual leave 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 2.71227 0.00000

01.01.2011 31.12.2011 02 REDDY sick leave 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 3.85728 0.00000

01.01.2011 31.12.2011 03 REDDY previligeleave 01.01.2011 31.12.2011 2.10432 0.00000

Edited by: rameshsemar on Oct 24, 2011 2:22 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

Delete that record and run the time evaluation again and check the result.

regards,

mohammed

sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Mohammed / Ramesh

this thread is already close and points were assigned to mohammed , please try to open another thread and discuss.

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

If you check the table T555F in which the grouping is mentioned as ( E - 65 - 4 - 83 ) this will be not there, coz of which the error is coming.

Go to SE11 --> T555F --> Display

Ctrl + Shift + F10 which will take you to table entries & just execute and check if that grouping is available there or not.

Regards,

Prasad Lad