on 2011 Apr 18 6:47 PM
Hello,
I am trying to use a Cost Center substitution on transaction KB21N to bring in the employees HR Mini Master Cost center when manually charging labor through KB21N. The problem is that the susbstitution populates both Sending and Receiving Cost Centers on the line item.
This means that I cannot charge labor to orders or project/WBS because I get a multiple Cost Object Error. Has anyone used a Cost center substitution in KB15N or KB21N that can share the experience.? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Justin
Hi, are you use OKC7?
check notes 392273,201897
Edited by: alex ice on Apr 18, 2011 8:31 PM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
These notes are helpful but I still cannot find anywhere an explanation for what is taking place. In note 392273 it says "In activity allocation (KB21, KB21N) or in the reposting of an activity allocation (KB65), the system prevents a substitution of the sender." I do not find this to be true.
Yes, I can substitute both Activity Type and Cost Center in the Senders. The substitution changes both sending cost center and receiving cost center to the value specified in the sub. The same is the case for Activity type.
Sub Rule in this case is below.
CO Area = '8600' AND
Personnel No. <> '' AND
Transaction code = 'KB21N' AND
Order >= '1000000' AND
Order <= '1999999'
Constant sub for Activity Type of "Other"
Thanks,
Justin
Hi, as per note you can't do this via substitution 'Receiver-Sender'.
May be the only way via with call-up point 'Item'(if can do this).
So the main issue is to separate receiver from sender. i advise to try do it in this way:
In prerequisites write if Business transaction=X,and Debit/Credit indicator=Credit
Hi Justin.
Did you eventually manage to get this resolved. I have a similar requirement and was wondering if you substituted at allocation - sender or line items? Line items seems to only offer one cost centre and then I see why it was populating both sender and receiver.
Can you please advise how you actually achieved this substitution?
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
9 | |
8 | |
7 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.