on 2009 Jan 29 4:43 AM
Hai All,
As per client setup- Client produces the goods when he receives requirement from customer. ( but it not make to Order- its considering as Make to Stock, so that it can be sold to other customers also).
When creating SO- Mat-1- Order qtty = 100 EA.
where as in sch.line - req date will be flown - w/o confirm the qtty ( as there is no stock in inventory).
after save this SO.
this req will be shown in MD04-
based on this Production dept, produce the req & Update the stock in inv.
Now before dispatching the same,
either we have to Run "availability check " from change SO or we have to confirm req "thorugh CO06" -
otherwise we cant create delivery ,as the req has not confirmed in sch.lines ( which is std process).
Where as to perform CO06 - will become an additional step for them.
Is there any Option -to avoid / run in Background, whenever they update the stock in Inventory with respective Material??
doubt clarified-
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Instead of CO06, it is better to run V_V2 where you have the option to run the program in background.
Once you go to TCode V_V2, from top menu bar, click on Program -- Execute in Background
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks,
I have gone through that Tcode before posting itself including CO06-
the issue is, Cant we avoid this step entirely-
bcoz, when stock is updating in inventory- that time itself this qtty in schedule line should be confirmed with the order qtty from the inventory.
which reduces one step to the users.
In that case, you may have to develop a zee transaction in such a way that whenever production entry is made, the same should be transferred to sale order.
To achieve this, you can consider Table VBEP where you have two fields
- WMENG:::::::for order quantity
- BMENG::::::::for confirmed quantity
With this, there is no need to once again run rescheduling.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
Yes,
We thought of this-
( the only thing, am looking for is- is there any possibility in Std SAP w/o going for any Z* development) .
Can you confirm that - can we use the Transparent table fields for Z* development???
as per info- we cant use these fields, for Z* report- such as extracting data-
plz clarify.
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
8 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.