cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Amount to Show in F-16 but not in Payslip

Former Member
0 Kudos
99

Hi,

1) Where can we enter earning amount which can not reflect anywhere in Salary Slip but it should reflect in Form-16 as a earning. (Example: Amount paid through cheque to the employee, so it should not reflect in salary but it should be in form-16)

2) Is such practice is right or wrong ?

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Any payment which is paid to an employee is an Earning and Tax will be caluculated on the earnings of the Employee

is this client requirment does the client is following the same Procedure in the Legacy

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yes, They are following the same.

As payment is made through cheque (i.e. not a part of salary & it will be one time or two-time), that should not reflect in Salary slip but as this is a income for employee it should come in form-16.

sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Than the wage type shd come into RT table i mean please pass that wage type in RT but shd not display in Payslip

But the amount shd get added to Gross Salary

here is the Rule

*

****

AMT= XXXX Wage type

ELIMI *

ADDWT /416

You can try this Create a wage type in IT0015 and give the amount and dont include that one in Pay slip and check the Gross salary income First try this later we will go for PCR as of now i think no need of PCR

And make sure that CC 25 is ticked to this wage type

PCR is not required for this secnario

Former Member
0 Kudos

I will check that scenario & then get back to you.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sikinder,

I checked the scenario, it works successfully except one thing. the amount also added in 'Net Pay' (WT /560).

I don't want to add the same in /560, how to do it.

- Created a new WT

CC25 ticked, CC1 ticked,

PC1 = 0

PC3 = 0

PC4=6

PC5=0

PC6=0

PC10=0

PC20=8

PC24=1

PC30=T

PC31=0

PC71=F

PC72=0

EC6 = 34

Edited by: hr-hr-hr on Mar 26, 2010 12:32 PM

Edited by: hr-hr-hr on Mar 26, 2010 12:46 PM

sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

check PRCL 5 check the specifications of it by F4 help

Former Member
0 Kudos

Following content available in F4 or PRCL5

0	Store in RT without split indicator
1	Addition in statutory net amount and total expenditure
3	Pass on in summarized form
4	Summarized storage in RT and subtraction in net
5	Summarized storage in RT and addition in total expenditure
6	Storage in RT with splits,Divide by GENAU,and addn to total expend
7	Storage in RT with splits and addn. in total expen.
8	Storage in RT with splits and deduction in Net
9	Storage in RT with splits
A	Pass on as it is

My present value is '0' out of that.

sikindar_a
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Try with 4 and 8

and let me update once i check this one

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Sir,

Thanx, got the solution by doing value '4' .

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

former_member147855
Participant
0 Kudos

hiiiiiiiiiiiiii

It is posible but taxation isue may also come in out. Create wage type for infotype 15 or 14 and write schema rule wich

not add in any display in pay slip directly add in gross income.