On a recent project the question was raised on various occasions as whether we should fully de-couple the infotype framework as part of the implementation. Some useful content below that may assist you to answer the same question. The purpose is not to provide a technical brief, as I’m sure there is content available already, but rather to provide some summary feedback on the investigations.
The project scope included HR Renewal 2.0 (FP 4) for HR Professional User Role. When implementing any of the ‘new technology’, by nature you are already using the de-coupled framework, and as part of this implementation should consider at least activate the ‘PC_UI’ Switch (see attached for example) on the system table. This is to ensure data consistencies between the User Interface (UI) method and database data tables.
Once activated, the tendency may be to fully de-activate the infotype framework. In simple terms, regardless as to whether the UI is a traditional SAP GUI modulepool screen or a ‘new technology’ screen; the same processing logic will be used in the outcome.
Do you need to fully de-couple the infotype framework? Consider below as part of your assessment:
Fully de-coupled infotype framework may only add value if your solution contains extensive use of the modulepool BAdi’s, or you planning on implementing extensive infotype custom enhancements. The main reason for this is that in the de-coupled infotype framework, the same user exists are called within the processing logic.
In Summary:
Give some thought to above points before fully de-coupling the infotype framework. The traditional infotypes and ‘new technology’ can co-exist and it’s worth the effort to do some initial homework before implementing an infotype framework solution.
I hope you found this content useful. Please contact me directly for further details.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
5 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |