Enterprise Resource Planning Blogs by Members
Gain new perspectives and knowledge about enterprise resource planning in blog posts from community members. Share your own comments and ERP insights today!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
joachimrees1
Active Contributor
22,697


I recently wrote how I go about Appending MARA (adding custom fields) (in S/4HANA and elsewhere)- as this is kind of the prequel to this blog, you probably want to read it.

 

Now lets do something a little more complicated: Appending MBEW!

SE11, MBEW, Navigate to EMBEW, Append Structure….

 

Create an append, in it create an include with a dummy field.

 

Activate the include;

Activate the append.

 

But what is this? We get an error when activating the append!

 



 

Here’s the error:



 

 

In SE11 everything looks just fine: the table is active, our field is there:



 

 

But we had the error on activation, and we also can see that there’s a problem in the application e.g. when trying to call MEBW in SE16n, we get a dump:



 

So, what is to do now?

 

Note 2242679 kind of helps us on that topic, it tells us to create an EXTEND VIEW

 

But actually, I had to create as many as 4 extend views, just to get that 1 dummy field working (display it in SE16n) in MBEW:

 

extend view mbv_mbew_ext

extend view Mbv_Mbew_Basis

extend view mbv_mbew_case

extend view mbv_mbew

 

(I also noticed, that in the first two I had to give the tablename MBEW.[Fieldname], while in the last two just [Fieldname] worked ).

 

 

I did NOT have to use report NSDM_PROXY_SUBSTITUTION – after I created the 4 append-views, SE16n is working, and when checking MBEW in SE11 I get “No inconsistencies found” -> just like it should be.

 

 

Conclusion:

This really was a lot of work to do, just to add one filed – on the positive side, I think it hepled my understaning of the CDS-paradigm and how it is used in the S/4HANA data model a little.

 

Smal sidenote:

For appending MARC you just need 1 extend view, but there you do utilize report NSDM_PROXY_SUBSTITUTION. Maybe I write more about that some other day.

 

 

Have you already appended some tables or structures, and found strange behavior? Let us know about it!

 

Best

Joachim

18 Comments
Labels in this area