Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 


Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Experts

In table Crmm_but_custno (in CRM) we found that the field Account_Group is empty for all the records. But in transaction BP, we are able to view the Account Group under the Classification Tab. What could be the reason?

Points will be rewarded

Thanks in advance


Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Dear RK,

The account group data for all the partners in CRM will be stored in the table CRMM_BUT_FRG0041. Pass the PARTNER_GUID to this table and you will get the Account group.

Best Regards,


Former Member
0 Kudos


Thanks for the response. yes i am able to see the account group for the concerned GUID in CRMM_BUT_FRG0041 table. But my question is that why we are unable to see account groups for the respective records in CRMM_BUT_CUSTNO table. Can you clarify me on this please?



Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi RK,

The table CRMM_BUT_CUSTNO is seems to be a Mapping table between R/3 and CRM.

when we maintain different number ranges for the BPs inorder to identify whether the BP is created in R/3 or in CRM this table will be filled with mapping data.

This is my assumption.

Reward if it helps you,



Former Member
0 Kudos


crmm_but_custno is the mapping table of business partners when you download customers from a R/3 system to CRM.

Are you sure that the same BP record in this table (not having acct group) is visible with a accnt group in trx. BP?

If that is the case, then may be the replication from R/3 to CRM did not fetch this record somehow in the mapping table.

This should not be a problem as accnt. group is only a relevant field in R/3 and in CRM, the account group is only relevant for the distribution of business partner master data from CRM to the R/3 System.

Hope this helps and reward if useful!