2009 Jan 20 5:26 PM
Hi,
Anyone knows how to work with SE91 transaction?, i´m using it to creating and display some messages, but when i transport this objects to QAS System, this shows "Message class Y_MSS_SEGURIDAD has not been maintained". The Y_MSS_SEGURIDAD is the object that i have been making to some abap developments. Anyone knows about this warning?
Thanks,
RCL.
Edited by: Ricardo Carrasco on Jan 20, 2009 6:26 PM
2009 Jan 20 5:46 PM
Hi
The system create a request as soon as u create or change a message class, just like the rest of abap objects.
So try to check if your class was transported to QAS System.
Max
2009 Jan 20 5:38 PM
Hi
Did you check the transport log to know if the transport carried the message & its sucessfully imported in your QAS system..
Thanks
Geetha
2009 Jan 20 5:45 PM
Hi,
Yes, i did it, but sap tranport the object normally.
Thanks,
RCL.
2009 Jan 20 5:46 PM
Hi
The system create a request as soon as u create or change a message class, just like the rest of abap objects.
So try to check if your class was transported to QAS System.
Max
2009 Jan 20 5:49 PM
Hi,
SE91 is the transaction to maintain messages:
if you use somehting like below in the ABAp object
message e000(zz) with '&' '&' '&' '&' .
here you are using message 000 of the message class zz similarly you can assign a message class to a object like below in the report statement of a program:
report Zxxxxx message id ZZ.
here you can give message like below:
message e000 with '&' '&' '&' '&' .
here the bprogram takes the default class as declared above.
you should check if the message class that you are using does exist in SE91.
Regards,
Himanshu
2009 Jan 20 6:11 PM
Hi Ricardo,
Go to se91 transaction give the message class and display.
In that screen go to Environtment->Transport Organizer.
Regards,
Rohit
2009 Jan 20 8:54 PM
Hi,
I know that i must transport the objects. In fact, i did it. The problem is that i see the changes in DEV system, but these changes are not implemented in the QAS System, assuming that there are automatic imports in QAS system through background job.
Apparently the is generated because the request is not transported, somehow, in the QAS system, then changes cannot be reflects.
Thanks,
RCL.
2009 Jan 20 9:44 PM
>
> assuming that there are automatic imports in QAS system through background job.
>
Assumption is mother of all screw-ups. Check the log for your transport in DEV to see if it ever made it to QAS. Ask your Basis admin to check on the transport.
2009 Jan 20 9:53 PM
Hi,
The Assumption is because there is a QAS system with automatic imports through background job. I know that you´re saying.
Thanks,
RCL.
2009 Jan 20 9:56 PM
As I said before, it's telling you that the message class itself (not the message) is not in QA. Have you looked into that?
Rob
2009 Jan 20 10:04 PM
If the transports are automated, it doesn't mean that they all go through successfully into QAS.
Have you, yourself, created this message class (not the particular message)?
Have you checked the log for the transport (SE01 -> enter request # -> click Log)? What does the log say?
2009 Jan 20 10:12 PM
Ok, i see....
I could see that there is a message related with the import in QAS, "Import steps not specific to transport request". Do you know about that? All other things related with the import says "Successfully completed".
Thanks a lot.
RCL.
2009 Nov 12 6:10 PM
Hola Ricardo;
A mi me paso lo mismo en la SE91, con una clase de mensaje, y descubrí que la clase de mensaje la creé con un paquete $TMP, y esta clase de paquete no se puede transportar, por ende, es posible que tengas el mismo problema.
Una solución es que cambies el nombre de la clase de mensaje, y crees una nueva, con un paquete del tipo Z001.
Richard, see in the transaction SE91, the propertys, because you create the message class with a package $TMP, you can't transport any oder because this is a Local Package. Try to modify the name of your message class to another, and create a new message class with other package.
Best regards.
Mariano
2009 Jan 20 9:01 PM
It looks as if the message class itself was never transported to QA.
Rob