Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Duplicate Invoice FB60.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Friends,

Actually in 4.5 version T.codes : MRHR, MRHG are working fine for Vendor Invoices,I didn't get any duplicate invoices Because they writen some custom program...

But in 6.2 version MRHR and MRHG are no longer use..here we are using through FB60/FB65.

IN FB60 standred program

SAPMF05A --> INCLUDE MF05AI00

--> MF05AI00_BETRAG_PRUEFEN

--> call function 'FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK'

Here My question is : By using this am getting the duplicate invoices so i need to avoid the duplicate invoices.....

My assumption is : I need to change the FM ?????

Could you plz help me anyone regarding this issue.

If possible send the code for changes the FunctionModule.

Thanks,

kumar.

7 REPLIES 7

Former Member
0 Kudos

As this problem seems to be caused by a standard FM, i would suggest to open a SAP Service Request ...

0 Kudos

Is there any chance to go for validation and substitution on config side ????

Former Member
0 Kudos

This should be configurable. Please look at OSS note # 305201.

Rob

0 Kudos

Hi

I saw that sap # 305201. i changed the config and tried in both ways but still the same ....

Output is :

-


Potential Duplicate Invoices

1 1900001416 AERA 70000577 333 03/24/06 100.00 USD

1 1900001418 AERA 70000577 333 03/24/06 100.00 USD

2 None Found

3 None Found

4 None Found

5 1900001416 AERA 70000577 333 03/24/06 100.00 USD

End of

0 Kudos

I guess I don't understand the problem yet; where is the output you are referring to coming from? Is it a report you run after posting a duplicate invoice?

Rob

0 Kudos

Hi,

I check the data in BSIP table it stores all the values.

My Question is : I need to avoid the duplicate invoices in T code: FB60.

Could you help me on that plz...

0 Kudos

Has view V_169P_DC been maintained through the IMG? Is it set to check for duplicates for the values you are looking at?

Rob