Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

GRACROLEUSAGE - Entries Incorrect - After running Synch jobs

0 Kudos

Hi Gurus,

We are on GRC SP13.

I am testing User Access Review (UAR) workflows.

I can see that UAR requests are being generated based on the GRACROLEUSAGE table.

In the target system a user had 2 composite roles and 2 single roles assigned.

I have raised GRC change account request to get one composite and one single role removed from the user.

Workflow completed succesfully.

Once this is done, I ran all synch jobs.

I checked GRACROLEUSAGE table. This table now shows target system user has one composite role and one single role.

I have raised another change account request to remove another composite role and single role.

Workflow complete succesfully and all roles are removed.

Now user in target system don't have any roles assigned.

I have re-ran all synch jobs.

Now when i checked GRACROLEUSAGE table, it still shows single roles which are part of composite role are assigned to the user.

I am not sure based on which tables this UAR workflows gathers data.

But when I see GRACROLEUSAGE table it is not getting updated correctly.

Anyone had come across this issue?

Please suggest



View Entire Topic
0 Kudos

HI Sai,

we come accross similar issue and we raise SAP OSS note. Our particular cases happens in situation when on UAR request we have in one request a user who has assigned Composite role and another user who has assigned Single role being a part of that specific Composite role, in this case UAR request is not showing the Single role being assigned to user.


We went for SP14 and the problem was solved.

I also recommend patching your GRC system SP13 with SP14 as there are other bugs - for example - forwarding does not work as expected (Problem occurs when reviewing UAR request in SAP GRC Access Control with FORWARD request functionality . After saving request by “SAVE” button (draft decisions) and when user is trying to forward (FORWARD button) particular line item to another person - > application is confirming (“SELECTING ASSIGNEMNT HAS BEEN FORWARD”) but still this line item exist on the user review list. )

Hope this helps,