Hi All,
We are calculating tax line item at each line item level in IS-U Print document.
I would like to know if there is standard SAP configuration which validates the below:
- Sum of tax line items $$ should be equal to Header $$ with GST app...
Hi All,
I would like to understand if we can include SD charges in the aggregation process for de-regulation?
For aggregation process, we have Service Provider Agreements (SPAs) created for the Service Provider. Now we can create IS-U billing & p...
Hi All,I have copied standard Enhanced Analytical Settlement Procedure and created a new custom settlement procedure for which I only want to build Interval customers profile as per PODs selected in my Settlement Units and as per different retailers....
Hi,I am trying to look for options where we can perform Gas Billing for Interval meters similar to the standard functionality we have for basic gas residential and small business customers.In this we would have the below set up:a) Unconverted raw rea...
Hi All,In our EHP6 env we are using '03 - Quantity Determination during Meter Reading' functionality for gas division.We have configured thermal gas billing and for this following have been created:a) Volume Correction Factor - This is created with 0...
Hi Rateesh,The error in the screenshot clearly shows that the second operand in your Rate for QUANTI12 variant rate step is supplied with 0 value and hence you are getting this division by zero error during billing.Please check how this second QUANT ...
Thanks Rakesh.I have resolved this issue as well.Correct entries were written in EEDMSETTLIN table and EEDMSETTLUF table by ASSIGNPOD step. Next settlement step was SUMINTSU which initially I thought was not aggregating the interval consumption prof...
Hi Rateesh,QUANTI31 variant calculates PF by referring to EPOWERF table and hence I think this may not be relevant to you.Please try using QUANTI13 variant to calculate Cosine Phi based on Active and Reactive energy and this variant uses the actual f...
Hi Rakesh,I have one more query on this.The basic scenario has worked in my case however I am trying to test a scenario where there are more than 1 POD selected in ASSIGNPOD step for aggregating interval meter consumption.In this scenario, when I exe...
Hi Rakesh,I have figured out the issue and I have got the scenario working now.The value that I was getting in Settlement Run logs for the interim profiles was not actual aggregated profile values but interim profile numbers and there was also a over...
