cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

SNOTE note implementation - Precedence of the validity of manual modifications.

jczettler
Explorer
0 Kudos
1,121

Greetings Everyone,

I encountered an interesting condition system during the implementation of a note in the manual activities.

The note is as follows: 3294279 - FPZW/FPRW: Error during value adjustment of tax refund document.

In the manual activities, there is a "VALID FOR" and a "NOT VALID FOR" section. What happens if both sections contain valid entries for the affected system?

jczettler_1-1729690170612.png

In such cases, which condition takes precedence? The "VALID FOR" or the "NOT VALID FOR"? What is the precedence?

Thank for the valuable answers!

 

View Entire Topic
jczettler
Explorer
0 Kudos

@Sandra_Rossi 

Logically, the condition system refers to software components, and since the system includes both, I believe that both should be considered. It doesn’t make sense to me to interpret them separately (as either/or).

If there is any official documentation that explains this in detail, please share it—I haven’t been able to find anything like that, unfortunately.

Sandra_Rossi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
Sorry, I misunderstood the question. SAP_BASIS is clearly not relevant, it must be a bug in this generated part (but I see it in other notes e.g. https://me.sap.com/notes/3479674/E). Better ask SAP support. I never saw any documentation about how to interpret the text from the SAP notes.
jczettler
Explorer
0 Kudos

-

jczettler
Explorer

Actually, there is a NOTE (2220520 - How to determine whether an SAP Note is valid for the system and can be implemented throug...) on how to interpret the text part, but it doesn’t cover this particular case (precedence). We will likely raise an incident/case with SAP.