Hi Team,
We are currently using multi tenancy feature from CAP and also using DwC. I have a question on designing HDI schemas for subscriber tenants.
Our project have multiple services that are are using multi tenancy and currently we have a separate service manager for each service. This results in x*y schemas where x is number of services with in an application and y is the number of subscribed tenants.
Is this approach correct ? I believe that in general all services (as long as they are coherent) should share same schema and hence they can use same service manager so that there is only Y number of schemas compared to above alternative.
Could you suggest which approach is better and why ? Thank you.
Bluesky
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.