Analysis Authorization Data is blank in RSECADMIN or RSECAUTH

[former_member218393]

Hello Experts,

We have upgraded our BW system to 7.50 SP 15. After upgrade we have noticed that, there is no InfoObject data in analysis authorization while checking in RSECADMIN or RSECAUTH but all data showing in table RSECVAL.

While checking further, we found that, there is no data in RSECVAL_STRING and RSECHIE_STRING which gets updated during upgrade. We found below note for this issue but its applicable until SP 06.

2324035 - After you upgrade to BW 7.40/BW 7.50, analysis authorizations are missing in the tables RSECVAL_STRING and RSECHIE_STRING

2387092 - Enhancement to correction report from SAP Note 2370622

2370622 - Missing entries in authorization tables after upgrade to BW 7.40 or higher

Could you please suggest how to resolve this issue?

Regards,

Biswaranjan

[FCI]

As I mentionned in my initial answer ;-), the program RSD_XPRA_REPAIR_RSCHAVL_740 copies the data from the RSEC tables to the RSEC*STRING tables.

This program was either not executed during the upgrade or encountered errors. Check the logs of the upgrade with your basis team.

[FCI]

As specified in note 2324035, the copy from the table RSEC* to the RSEC*STRING is handled by the program RSD_XPRA_REPAIR_RSCHAVL_740 in the upgrade process.

Any error occured during this phase ?

Regards,

Frederic

[former_member218393]

Hello Frederic,

As I mentioned in my initial query,

1. We can see the analysis authorozation InfoObject data in table RSECVAL but there is no data showing while checking the analysis authorozatiin via RSECADMIN Or RSECAUTH transaction.

So, my query is,

Q. I need know why this was happened and how to resolve this. ?

2. While checking we found that RSEC*STRING table doesn't contain any data relates to AA and correction is there in the above said note but this note is only applicable for 7.50 SP 06 or lower and our SP is 15. So this note is not applicable to our system.

Q. How to resolve this issue now?

What I am thinking is that point no. 1 is related to point 2. So please let me know if you have faced this issue before how we can resolve this now.

Regards,

Biswaranjan