
So what is Suite on HANA?
SAP announced that their business suite (except SRM) will now be available on their in-memory platform, HANA (SRM will follow soon). This is a follow-up to their launch of the HANA platform about 18 months ago which has primarily been used to support databases in-memory and their analytics platform, Business Warehouse. I was fortunate to be invited to the global press event in Palo Alto, courtesy of mark.finnernand the SAP Mentor program (Disclosure: SAP covered my travel costs to the event).
Several people have written excellent blogs about Suite on HANA so I will point you to some of these blogs for an explanation of the technology and their implications.
(note: some of the more technical aspects are beyond me! So the technical explanations below are very general and prone to errors (I am sure someone will correct me…)
Key technical aspects
So you get the idea: Innovations in in-memory technology makes SAP HANA is fast!
SAP HANA is fast. So what?
Fast is good. But just fast is not enough! This has always been true with technology and systems innovation. It not enough to simply apply innovative technology to the existing process to make it faster because (a) you are going to make the weaknesses of the process more pronounced, and (b) you are not taking full advantage of what the technology has to offer – what new things you can do with speed. To fully benefit from the innovation, it is essential to re-think business process. We heard several statements along these lines at the press event. SAP HANA can:
Getting back to the “so what” question, here are some implications of the in-memory capabilities of SAP HANA:
But these observations only address the “so what” question to a certain point. leonardo.araujowrote a blog on the business value of the Suite on HANA that made the point that the business value proposition must be identified for organizations to realize the benefits of HANA.
You get the point. There will be change. There must be change – in processes and user interactions – to truly benefit from the Suite on HANA.
Transformation without disruption.
One interesting point that was repeated many times during the press event is “transformation without disruption.” Is that even possible? I heard several people ask that question in conversations at the press event. Upon reflection, it seems to me that the SAP executives were really talking about the technical transformation rather than business transformation. That is, the transformation from the non-HANA to the HANA technical platform will be non-disruptive. The technical migration involves migration of the database to the HANA database and applying a service pack to the system. I will let the technical experts comment on how non-disruptive this will be! But can business transformation be non-disruptive? I am not so sure. Changing how you interrogate data to make decisions and solve problems that were previously unsolvable, and taking advantage of doing something in real time that took hours or days will require a disruption in how users think of their processes and how they interact with the system.
Design Thinking
When asked about how businesses will understand the business value of the Suite on HANA, SAP executives responded with: use design thinking. In fact, one statement was that SAP would send design thinking experts to companies and, in about 24 hours, help them understand the business value. Perhaps it will be that simple. I think not.
Design thinking essentially says the user must be the focus of all design. Most of the activities in the design thinking process are aimed at understanding the specific needs of a user and creating a design to meet these needs. Is this something new? I think not! Those of us in the Management Information Systems discipline (primarily in B-schools) have advocated and taught user-centric design and the importannce of user involvement in design for decades. I am glad that engineers and computer scientists have now become aware of the importance of focusing on the end user :wink: . Perhaps, finally, finally, SAPGUI will be history. I am an optimist.
Training and Education
In a comment his blog noted above, Leo asks who is responsible for educating businesses and users. There are several stakeholders. The businesses themselves must want to learn. SAP must provide clear examples and use cases that demonstrate the business value of SAP HANA. Consultants will play a major role. And, for the next generation of leaders, the SAP University Alliances program will have a huge role. I am sure, more will be written on exactly what the role of these stakeholders is.
One thing that troubled me is the reaction of some of the executives at the press event to the question of what is SAP doing to provide adequate training and education to users and businesses. The responses by some executives were something to the effect: "if we need to provide training then we have failed" or "how much training did you need to use your smartphone?" or "we have made it so easy that one will not need training." Yes, SAP has created some cool user interfaces recently: the 10 or so dashboards for the Suite; SAP Personas; interfaces for mobile apps, etc. These are simple and easy to use and perhaps (although I am not convinced) they will not need user training. However, most of SAP users are still on SAPGUI! This has not changed with Suite on HANA. Further, and more importantly, it is not so much about training a user on how to use a particular interface; it is about educating users and organizations about what they can do with the technology - the value they can gain for themselves and their organizations. Nothing the SAP does will eliminate the need for this type of education. Design thinking is not just about user-centric design; it is also about ensuring that the user understands the value of the system and actually uses it.
More information:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
23 | |
20 | |
9 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |