Decades ago when we heard about the TLA (three letter acronyms) of BPO (business process outsourcing), BPS (business process services), and BPA (business process analysis), the world was quaked by the models of process outsourcing + offshoring where business activities are managed at a distant to primarily gain a cost advantage.
The key concept was to move away the organization’s non core competencies / activities that do not add "value" directly by the organization’s employees and it can be outsourced - get a cost/ productivity advantage and move the current employees to do better/ more core/ business focused tasks and operations. Essentially move the entire organization one level up in the value chain: people who do mundane operational tasks will now do tactical tasks and who did tactical activities will move over to take strategic actions. It was surely never about moving out jobs, or even closing down business operations - or M&A. It was a move to do Business Process Optimization by moving to Offshore (a low cost location) or outsource the process (to an organization that will do it much more efficiently- quicker and effectively- with less error and pass on the benefits of doing so to the main organization).
It is almost that wave felt now with RPA = robotic process automation, while I would want to give an added letter in the name with RBPA = Robotic business process automation. There have been several conversations about what is the difference between a traditional automation and Robotic automation, and I would urge people to read the attached article to get a few examples and insight to this question (http://www.xchanging.com/system/files/dedicated-downloads/robotic-process-automation.pdf).
One simple way to explain is to imagine a process that has say 10 steps/ activities or tasks. We can categorize these 10 steps in a way to understand process automation & RPA:
When we say traditional process automation it means
And when we speak about RBPA (robotic business process automation) it means
The essence of RBPA is to characterize an application/ software/ program as a Robot who can perform the quintessential tasks to perfection. The key benefits of RBPA for an organization are:
While some of the statements from above may be my individual opinions, some of these are yet to be proven with satisfactory results. It may sound as if the RBPA is an extension to the BPO / BPS world but it is much beyond the same- in terms of defining the right set of tools/ frameworks/ processes to enable a Robot to take up operations and tasks.
Traditionally Business Process protagonists have always spoken about LSS = lean six sigma as a critical methodology to improve/ automate/ get the business processes in the organization to next level of maturity. Where Lean focuses on reducing waste, the Six Sigma focuses on reducing the error rate and brings in standardization and consistency. The methodologies may involve complex attributes development of a process such as standard deviation, sigma etc, but the results were fruitful with improving the process effeciency and effectiveness and reducing cost. So what is different with RBPA is that RBPA can be very well built on the principles of LSS – where the robots/ programs being designed to perform the human tasks can be engineered with LSS at the backdrop.
Two key technology areas will attract interest in this field of RBPA i.e. ERP (enterprise resource planning) and BPM (business process management). Traditionally ERP have seen automation as a key driver to enhance/ upgrade/ provide next level of system design e.g. SAP ERP moves to HANA with performance as a key measure, while BPM products (BPMS- bpm suites) are closer to realization of process automation for traditionally human focused tasks. We should watch out for the next level of Technology and Tools coming up in this direction of Robotic Process Automations, along with BPM and BPS focus area.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 |