In complex integration landscapes, where numerous HTTP sender channel interfaces are in place, security concerns often arise. The challenge is finding an authentication method that avoids using basic credentials or client ID and secret as the username and password. Additionally, changing the sender channels across all interfaces to a different adapter is not practical, as it would require significant effort. Moreover, certificate-based authentication is not a feasible option for all sender systems. This situation calls for a solution that enhances security without requiring extensive changes or effort in the iFlow.
This blog outlines the use case for securing an iFlow in Cloud Integration, which has an HTTP sender channel. The aim is to ensure that the iFlow cannot be triggered directly via basic authentication using a username and password while maintaining a secure interface connection.
The requirements for this use case are as follows:
The demo iFlow under consideration in Cloud Integration is named "Http Sender iFlow". This iFlow currently has an HTTP sender channel, which is illustrated in the image below.
Currently, this iFlow can be successfully triggered by any user with the role ESBMessaging.send.
If the grant type of the service key is changed to anything else, the sender channel must be adjusted accordingly.
Additionally, using the client ID and secret for basic authentication is not acceptable as per the requirement.
To meet the outlined requirements for the iFlow in Cloud Integration, a robust solution is necessary to prevent direct triggering via basic authentication, ensure the continued use of the HTTP channel, and enhance the overall security of the interface connection. By integrating OAuth 2.0 authorization via SAP APManagement, basic authentication with a more secure method can be replaced, ensuring that only authenticated and authorized users can trigger the iFlow.
Additionally, configuring certificate-based authentication between SAP API Management and SAP Cloud Integration further strengthens security by verifying identities through certificates. Lastly, leveraging custom user roles allows for precise control over access permissions, aligning with the goal of maintaining a secure and efficient integration environment. This multi-faceted approach not only addresses the immediate security concerns but also provides a scalable and robust framework for future enhancements.
To achieve this, following steps have to be performed.
Note: Please make sure no other service keys are created in this instance
Note: replace \n with enter and remove double quotes)
The details of host, client id and secret can be identified from the service key which is explained in the next step
Host: url value without https://
Since connection type is Cloud Integration, catalog service setting is not applicable
<OAuthV2 async="false" continueOnError="false" enabled="true" xmlns="http://www.sap.com/apimgmt">
<Operation>GenerateAccessToken</Operation>
<GenerateResponse/>
<SupportedGrantTypes>
<GrantType>client_credentials</GrantType>
</SupportedGrantTypes>
</OAuthV2>
<OAuthV2 async="false" continueOnError="false" enabled="true" xmlns="http://www.sap.com/apimgmt">
<Operation>GenerateAccessToken</Operation>
<GenerateResponse/>
<SupportedGrantTypes>
<GrantType>client_credentials</GrantType>
</SupportedGrantTypes>
</OAuthV2>
For testing the set-up, Insomnia API client is used to trigger the data. API client is configured as below.
Operation: POST
URL : End point of API_Http_Sender_iFlow_v1
Grant Type: Client Credentials
Access Token URL : End point of API_GenerateOAuthToken_v1
Client id : Application Key value
Client Secret : Application Secret Value
Click on Fetch Tokens and click on Send
Now, you will not be able to trigger this iflow with basic authentication because there is no service key with client id and secret for the custom role http.flow
Now, the following questions arises.
The above requirement can be met by following the below steps.
Now, based on the values provided in the API URL, respective iFlow is triggered.
Below mentioned blogs are two excellent references. I have used them to extend this strategy.
This document outlines a proposed solution to enhance the security of an iFlow in Cloud Integration that uses an HTTP sender channel. The key requirements for this solution are:
To address these requirements, the following solution is proposed:
Please feel free to discuss your experiences and provide your feedback in the comment section of this blog post.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
20 | |
17 | |
17 | |
11 | |
8 | |
8 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 |