- SAP Managed Tags
This year, I've witnessed a fascinating contrast in the world of SAP RFPs. I've had the opportunity to be involved in both ends of the spectrum: from exciting, purpose-driven proposals that prioritized value and innovation to more traditional, checklist-based approaches.
It's been inspiring to see clients championing this shift towards a more collaborative and value-focused selection process for their SAP implementation partners. I'm eager to share my observations and insights on how this transformation is unfolding and what it means for the future of successful SAP projects. I'm also keen to hear about your own experiences and perspectives on this evolving landscape.
1. From Requirements List to Interactive Blueprint:
Traditional: A lengthy document outlining every technical specification, often stifling creativity and limiting the exploration of innovative solutions.
Modern: Host a collaborative workshop where client and potential partners jointly develop a visual blueprint of the desired future state. This interactive approach encourages open dialogue, challenges assumptions, and fosters a shared understanding of the vision.
2. From Price Comparisons to Value-Based Assessments:
Traditional: A focus on the lowest bid, often leading to compromises on quality, experience, and long-term value.
Modern: Request a "Value Proposition Canvas" from each potential partner. This canvas outlines the partner's understanding of your key business pains, their proposed solutions, and the quantifiable value they aim to deliver. This shifts the focus from cost to return on investment.
3. From One-Size-Fits-All to Tailored Proof of Concepts:
Traditional: Generic presentations and case studies that may not resonate with your specific challenges.
Modern: Challenge potential partners to develop a tailored Proof of Concept (POC) addressing a critical business problem you face. This provides tangible evidence of their expertise, problem-solving approach, and ability to deliver tangible results.
4. From Formal Interviews to "Day in the Life" Simulations:
Traditional: Structured interviews that may not reveal true team dynamics and cultural fit.
Modern: Conduct a "Day in the Life" workshop where your team and the potential partner collaborate on a simulated project scenario. This provides valuable insights into communication styles, problem-solving approaches, and overall team synergy.
5. From Static Documents to Dynamic Collaboration Platforms:
Traditional: Paper-based or static digital RFPs that limit interaction and feedback.
Revolutionized: Utilize collaborative platforms that allow for real-time communication by asking intelligent questions, document sharing, and feedback loops throughout the RFP process. This fosters transparency, encourages engagement, and ensures everyone is aligned.
The RFP Revolution: A Call to Action
By embracing these concrete examples and adopting a more collaborative, value-driven, and holistic approach, we can transform the RFP process from boring check list document into a catalyst for forging truly trans-formative SAP partnerships. Let's modernize the procurement landscape together!
Here's how we can reshape the traditional RFP's commercial strategy, shifting from a cost-centric approach to one that fuels innovation:
Traditional RFP (Cost Focus) ➡️ Revolutionized RFP (Innovation Focus)
Price-Driven Selection ➡️ Value-Based Assessment:
Old: Lowest bidder often wins, potentially sacrificing quality and long-term value.
New: Evaluate proposals on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), ROI projections, and the partner's commitment to continuous improvement and value delivery.
Fixed Scope & Requirements ➡️ Agile & Outcome-Oriented:
Old: Rigidly defined scope limits flexibility for innovative solutions to emerge during the project.
New: Define desired business outcomes and allow for iterative development, incorporating new technologies or approaches as needed.
Payment Tied to Deliverables ➡️Shared Risk & Reward Models:
Old: Vendor gets paid for completing tasks, even if the overall solution doesn't meet expectations.
New: Explore gain-sharing agreements, outcome-based pricing, or joint innovation funds to incentivize partners to deliver exceptional results.
Key Questions to Ask Potential Partners (Innovation Focus):
How will you leverage emerging technologies (e.g., AI, automation) to drive innovation and efficiency in our SAP implementation? Give an example of your business problem to solve!
Can you provide examples of how you've helped other clients in our industry achieve breakthrough results through innovative SAP solutions?
How will you ensure that our SAP implementation remains flexible and adaptable to future business changes and technological advancements?Give an example of your business problem to solve!
What is your approach to knowledge transfer and co-innovation, ensuring that our team is empowered to drive ongoing innovation with SAP? Give an example of your business problem to solve!
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 13 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 |
