Stock transfer between EWM storage location to IM Storage location

[former_member840027]

Hi,

Inbound with PO and outbound process Sales Order is working fine between ERP and EWM.

When trying to do the stock transfer between EWM storage location to IM storage location, In the ERP I am doing transfer posting Mvt 311.

The  ERP storage location is link to warehouse and this warehoue is link to EWM warehoue.

So when creation transfer posting in ERP, system should create outbound delivery, which will get distributed to EWM.

But getting error message " No ship-to party defined in Table T321 for ref. movement type 311".  System asking to maintain " LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management"

Am i missing some setting.?

Thanks in advance

Regards,

SS

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

I too had similar scenario.  No entry maintained in t321 Table.  But the Ship To was determined from Table T001W.  we maintained a ship to party under STO Plant specific shipping data.

regards,

Shetty

[former_member840027 · Accepted solution]

Thanks Shashidhar,

I too have ship to party maintained for plant under STO . I see the entry in table T001W.

Still I have to error.

Is it any thing to do with BP role of plant in EWM.

Plant  is maintained as BP role Business partner (Gen) with ID type CRM011.

Do I have to make this plant also as Customer CRM002 and vendor  CRM004 ?

Thanks and Regards,

Sanjay

[SerhanEr · Accepted solution]

Hi Sanjay,

Go to: Logistics Execution>Decentralized WMS Integration >Central Processing>Application>Define Interface to Inventory Management and Delivery-Relevant Data>Delivery-Relevant Data for Warehouse Number

and define the vendor and ship to party you created for stock transfers.

Hope this setting will move to Extended Warehouse Management Integration one day, everyone is missing.

Best regards.

Serhan.

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Serhan..

Perfect.., thanks.

Sanjay.., I too have this maintained in my system.

[former_member840027 · Accepted solution]

Greate... Serhan.

I could do my scenario successfully.

Thanks  Shashidhar

Regards,

Sanjay