cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Report /SCWM/R_CHM_LOG_ACT for recalculate capacity inconsistency doesn't work

0 Likes
2,813

Hi Experts,

We have a problem with running capacity recalculation for bin and HU in the background. We are using CHM - Check Monitor where we defined profile for Capacity Recalculation:

When we do the check based on this profile manually, we get correct info about inconsistency, like:

And from there we are able to process the inconsistency which updates weight and volume of the bin and HU.

Problem starts when we want to do the same in background job. It has 2 steps:

1. Run the program /SCWM/R_CHM_PRF_RUN which correctly fills log (like above)

2. Run the program /SCWM/R_CHM_LOG_ACT which should pick up the entries in the log and process the inconsistencies. Here nothing happens after running this program - no update.

Do we miss some setting or maybe it is not supported (yet)? I know that somewhere in 2020 the old report for capacity update was replaced by the new functionality in CHM. Maybe background work for this option was forgotten?

Thanks for help!

Maja

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

samuel_chausse
Explorer
0 Likes

Hello

I am facing the exact same situation. I even went through your exact same steps. I was expecting that the follow-up actions will be triggered automatically in background (as there is no choice / alternative ; and because this check is not stamped as " Only Check" ).

Now I wonder which are these checks / inconstancies which can actually be fixed by /SCWM/R_CHM_LOG_ACT.

Looking forward to read any answers as well.

Best Regards

Samuel C.

PatrickMueller
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Likes

Hello,

have you seen the following information in SAP Note 2883401:
Only those actions can be executed by the report which are enabled for background execution. Actions which require end user input or confirmation can not be executed in background mode."

0 Likes

Hello,

Yes, I was aware of that. I only don't know how to understand "end user input" in this case. All I need to do when I process it in foreground is this:

And I think this kind of follow-up function must be done for every inconsistency processing. SO, from this perspective capacity inconsistency is not different. Or should I maybe additionally enable this action somewhere in customizing or other default settings for background processing? Or maybe implementing the note could help?

Thanks for help,

Regards,

Maja