on 2020 Feb 04 2:33 PM
Team:
We've 2 requirements, that to my mind, are potentially in conflict with each other.
While the Product Sub works on the premise of unavailable supply (stock, receipts or capacity) triggering the substitution, the ask for resource capacity to be always utilized at 100% means, the Capacity is never available, rendering the "capacity unavailable" situation for Prod Substitution ineffective.
Was wanting to understand if anyone had the experience of exploring the Optimizer solution in this case.
Cheers
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Andy,
Not sure if I have fully understood your requirement but here are my comments on your questions
Girish - Optimizer considers all type of costs and try to achieve solution with minimum total cost, if you want to force optimizer to achieve 100% capacity utilization them model MINCAPAUSAGE and MINCAPAUSAGEVIOLCOSTRATE Key figures. Based on the cost model it will force utilization for that resource to Minimum capacity usage.
Girish - Everything is cost play again, so if inventoryholdingcostrate is higher at SFG level compare to FG level then it will do force production.
Girish - It will look for total cost of fulfillment, for whatever product total fulfilment cost is lower (Main product or Substitute Product) it will use that product to meet the demand.
If you have any further question, please let me know
Thanks
Girish
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 12 | |
| 11 | |
| 8 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.