on 2020 Mar 15 4:23 PM
Dear Gurus,
We are implementing TM Basic Shipping scenario in an embedded system on S/4 HANA 1909, but I guess the question could be valid for decentralized TM (9.x) as well.
In an (outbound) delivery based process, if I have a Freight Order with multiple stages (coming from multiple outbound deliveries, thus multiple ship-to parties), the outputs like Road Waybill / CMR are generated for the whole document, not just per destination.
The requirement would be to have separated output (for example Road Waybill / CMR printout) generated for each single destination.
Is there any standard way to achieve this? Like do some magic in PPF settings or anything else?
Thank you and Best Regards,
Tamás
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Tamás,
I have the same question for a Shipper scenario, also finding a way to fit it in our scenario's.
For a LSP scenario this can be achieved by following these steps:
1. Create FWO Type where you set the HBL or HAWB Strategy as "HBL_SHPCNS"
2. Create FU Type where you set the HBL or HAWB Strategy as "HBL_SHPCNS"
3. Create FO type where you set the HBL or HAWB Strategy as "HBL_SHPCNS" (probably optional)
4. Create a House Waybill Stock which is referring to you ORG ID in The FWO.
Create a FWO where the ship-ti's are maintained on item level. In the FWO click on the button "HBL --> Draw HBL Number"
The waybill numbers are drawn from the waybill stock for each FU.
Create a FO with the standard SAP output and you will see that the CMR form is split per waybill number.
I you read the documentation regarding MBL and HBL it is written from a LSP perspective where the HBL number is the number between Shipper and LSP and the MBL number is between LSP and Carrier. I think SAP did not intent this for Shippers because "normally" the creation of execution documents is done by a LSP or carrier.
What you can do is draw the numbers manually on the FU's and then create CMR from the FO. I think that it is possible to create a Creation Strategy which draws the numbers for the FU but i prefer that they are drawn from the DTR's, the outcome is the same.
I hope this helps a bit.
BR,
Sander
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
the_flying_dutchman
Thank you very much, based on your answer I was able to transform it into our scenario.
In a nutshell,
... and now the Waybill no. is determined correctly and Road Waybill / CMR outputs are decomposed.
Regards,
Tamás
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.