cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

MIGO GR posting date ignored in EWM Inbound delivery

former_member722016
Participant
0 Kudos
3,817

Hi all,

After do a MIGO 501 the system creates an Inbound delivery in EWM which is posted inmediatly. The problem is the inbound delivery is replacing the posting date we are putting in MIGO with the actual date. Is there a configuration for this?

Thanks!

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

lcaglar
Explorer

Hi,

It is not possible to manipulate the posting date with the date you entered on MIGO. EWM always takes into account the date/time of current day.

You can use BAdI /SCWM/EX_ERP_MAPOUT_ID_CONFDEC with enhancement spot /SCWM/ES_ERP_MAPOUT to change the posting date of the inbound delivery. And also if you want you can extend the delivery UI screen to get delivery date from user with enhancement spot /SCWM/ES_DLV_UI_SCREEN.

hannes_mack
Explorer
0 Kudos
If you need to influence the date please see note 2574109 https://userapps.support.sap.com/sap/support/knowledge/en/2574109
Andrey_Andriyan
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Kudos

Hello Lucas,

Additionally to these badis above you can consider a few alternatives:

1. Fill a user parameter DLV_POSTING_DATE with the required date in your technical RFC user or your own user. For further details please check the note 2173575 - Posting date for goods movements from EWM; but please be aware that such a correction is not considered as standard routine is supposed to be used for the processing of issues.

2. Enable the editing of the queues according to note 2244179 - How to Use Queue Editing for qRFC Messages from EWM; but again, this measure is aimed to fix the issues and not to be used only daily basis.

If you want to use the date you entered in MIGO you probably need first to transfer it to EWM and save it somewhere, Z field or maybe Z date to see it with all other dates in your DLV; when your delivery is updated and posted this date can be included into the container and returned to ECC.

I'd also pay attention to the date of delivery and material document; if I remember correctly we had some questions regarding the misalignment of these dates.

Good luck,

Regards,

Andrey