on ‎2021 Nov 25 1:07 PM
Hi Experts
my understanding is that
2.1)SS* is calculated via a local formula (row 33,33,34)
3.we perform a normal dynamic lot size procedure in period T (50) always using
3.1)normal coverage span CP defined by SUBPERIODSOFSUPPLY (2 for period T)-->output Additional Lot size (row 25)+
3.2)using SS* instead of SS -->output(row 34)+
3.3)standard dependent demand of the period -->output(row 17)+
3.4)standard independent demand of the period -->output(row 18)+
3.5)projected stock(t-1)-->output(row 24 of (t-1))-
In my case the should be
ND =Additional Lot size (4700)+ SS*(14000)+ DD (100) + ID(0)- ProjStock[t-1](100) resulting in 18700
but I have 14000 .Why?
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Girish,
thanks for your respone
unfortunately is not clear
6 subsequent periods (51..56)make 14000 not 9300
thanks
cheers,
GP
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
revanchatraban
that's clear.
LsP 5 is dynamic one so you start to calculate only if without considering the procedure there is a Net demand
in period 2 and 3 NT is 150 and project stock is Higher 200 and 300 so conditions are not met.
All this makes sense since you do not want to trigger receipts for lot size procedure if you do not have already that receipt.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
IBP Calculation is correct because demand horizon do not overlap each other, their calculation is sequencial for demand horizon
For W50 there will 2 calculation
1. 2 Periods will SUM demand from W51+52 = 4700
2. 6 Periods will SUM Demand from W1+W2+W3+W4+W5+W6 = 9300
So total 4700+ 9300 = 14000.
Thanks
Girish
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Girish,
The calculation about lot size procedure 5 seems very confusing even in the below SAP Help Portal Link.
In the example provided in the link, there is no net demand in period 2 and 3. I don't understand the logic why there is not net demand.
I suspect the usage of supply algorithm other than Infinite Heuristic.
Thanks and Regards,
Revan C
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 16 | |
| 16 | |
| 6 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.