IDOC Extension

[vaishali_singh]

Hi,

I have a requirement to create extension for SHPMNT05. I have created 2 segments header(4 fields) and item(1 field). . header is added to E1EDT20 and item added to E1EDL20. In FM IDOC_OUTPUT_SHPMNT, created an enhancement to fill the idoc structure for both header and item fields. when triggered from VT02N , only header fields are showing and item structure is blank. status code 26 & 29.

in log of status 26 showing error in program SAPLEDI1 in subroutine FA5_DOCUMENT_SYNTAX_CHECK.

need help on this issue. where am I going wrong. the enhancement in the FM is not getting triggered by breakpoint. only the above routine is triggered at breakpoint but not clear about what is causing issue.

[Sandra_Rossi]

1. So, is your extension triggered or not? (you say you generate the IDoc, but you cannot debug although you can debug around, difficult to understand what you're saying)
   
   Force a short dump and you'll know. IDoc status 26 means syntax error.
   
   
2. Easy to check: do the segments respect the structure defined by the IDoc type in WE30?
   
   They should be the exact same sequence of segments, some segments may be mandatory, some may be repeated, etc. The technical fields are also checked, they must be coherent (SEGNUM, PSGNUM, HLEVEL).

[vaishali_singh]

No, only 2 out of 4 header fields are showing in header segment in we02 and item field is not displaying in item segment in we02

[Sandra_Rossi]

This doesn't really answer my 2 questions. Let's try differently. So, you have created 2 segment types and you added them as an extension to SHPMNT05. You are saying that 2 fields of these segments are filled, so it means that your custom ABAP code is filling these fields. If you can't debug it, maybe you are not activating the right options. Try activating the UPDATE DEBUGGING option.

[vaishali_singh]

Debug issue is resolved. Fm is debugged but the issue which is causing this status 26 in WE02 is that data records are not coming under hierarchy. but they are coming as 4 separate segments. for now I have added the logic to pass hierarchy level, parent segment and segment no but still no change in we02. still ending with 26 status

[Sandra_Rossi]

I'm again repeating, do the segments respect the structure defined by the IDoc type in WE30? If you can't compare by yourself, attach the screenshots of WE02 segment structure and WE30 segment structure.

[DominikTylczyn]

@Sandra_Rossi admire your patience 

[vaishali_singh]

Thanks Sandra for your inputs. Able to resolve the issue now. The receiver port was being passed incorrectly. Fetched it from Edp13 table. Now data is coming in proper format in WE02. Thanks for your help on this

[vaishali_singh]

Hi Sandra, One issue we are facing is when we are triggering IDOC through VT02N in WE02 we are getting 2 IDOC generated. One has the standard SHPMNT05 values and the other one has our custom extension values. Checked in NACE also 1 subroutine I created is added and in partner profile also one msg type added in message control. could there be some other reason for 2 idocs generating at same time?

[Sandra_Rossi]

I guess your code is wrong, or you are doing something that is not supported by standard.

[iwona_hahn]

Answered by Sandra_Rossi.