on 2018 Dec 10 7:35 PM
Hi,
As per WO creation rule and WO limit, i'm creating one Pick-HU per each WT of the WO. The WO creation rule has 'Create HU' flagged, and the 'assign wt to HU's' not flagged.
So in a scenario where i have 1 WO to pick two cartons, im creating 2 WT's, and, because of the limit, 2 Pick-HUs.
Pick HU are getting well created, and assigned to the WO, but i was hoping that while confirming the WT's by RF or backoffice, i would be able to scan any of the 2 pick hus as destination HU for any of the 2 WTs. This is not the case. Instead, system assigns by default one of the two Pick HUs as destination HU of the 2 WT's..
If i choose the flag 'assign wt to hu's' in the WOCR, system assigns each Pick HU to a specific WT, which is also not the requirement. Client's requirement is to be able to scan any pick-hu of the WO, to confirm any WT of this WO. I can only manage this with exception code 'CHHU' to change the destination HU given by default by the system, but this option is not optimal.
Any advise on the best practice?
Regards,
João
Request clarification before answering.
Hi Joao,
I am facing the same issue. If you don't want to use the automatic assignment, you have to use the exception code CHHU to change the pick HU.
BR
Foued
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.