Delivery error- EWM - /scwm/erp integration605

[st_m]

Hello,

I have a outbound delivery in S4, after saving the system try to distribute the delivery but I´m facinf the next issue:

"Unexpected value 0 in parameter IV_CHANGE_TST_EWM"

In SMQ2, the message is different:

Has anyone faced the same issue?

Thanks in adavance.

[former_member845189]

Hello All,

I am getting same error but couldn't fix even if i maintain consolidation group number range. Any other areas that I need to check..

- When I initially save -system says delivery is distributed but when I check it in change mode - it throws this error.

- I couldn't see ERP delivery details in SMQ1 or in EWM.

Process I am trying it Sales order - outbound delivery process..

Unexpected value 0 in parameter IV_CHANGE_TST_EWM

Message no. /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION605

[st_m]

Problem solved Dominik,

It was the consolidation group number range, /SCWM/DSGR, it wasn´t created.

Thanks for your help!

[DominikTylczyn]

Hello st_m

The error is triggered in the /SCWM/OUTB_DLV_CHANGE2 function, around line 102:

        ASSERT ID /scwm/erpintegration CONDITION iv_change_tst_ewm IS NOT INITIAL.
        IF iv_change_tst_ewm IS INITIAL.
          /scwm/cl_erp_message_helper=>raise_faulty_data(
              iv_msgno = 605
              iv_msgv1 = iv_change_tst_ewm
              iv_msgv2 = 'IV_CHANGE_TST_EWM' ).
          IF 1 = 0.
            MESSAGE e605(/scwm/erpintegration).
            " Unexpected value &1 in parameter &2
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.

IV_CHANGE_TST_EWM must not be initial.

I have not found any notes on the problem. So it looks like either a bug that needs to be reported to SAP support or a side effect of a custom enhancement.

You can debug the /SCWM/OUTB_DLV_CHANGE2 function by activating the /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION checkpoint group in SAAB transaction.

Best regards

Dominik Tylczynski

[st_m]

Thanks Dominik,

But I´n not able to stop the program even with /SCWM/ERPINTEGRATION active in SAAB:

With this setting, should stop here right?

Thanks,
KR.

[DominikTylczyn]

st_m Yes, it should stop there. Maybe it is processed in an update task, try activating update task and RFC debugging.