cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Read only

Backflush from ECC for Single Order Component- Badi or enhacement spot

shailesh_mishra5
Product and Topic Expert
Product and Topic Expert
0 Likes
1,757

Hello Experts,

For advanced production integration, components which are marked as backflush for single order stock, SAP EWM does not allow to post consumption from ECC using CO11N. We are staging via PMR but want to consume single order component via co11n from ECC for few components marked as backflush. ( Decentral EWM on S/4 HANA 2020). Though this is available in Embedded version 2020, but for decentral there is no functionality available

As backflush only works for cross orders components, what's the enhancements options possible or any Badi to influence consumption of PMR Single order components marked as backflush in ECC?

My requirement is CO11N should post consumption OPC delivery which should consume the PSA stock having PWR assignment.

PS: We also explored to mimic Backflush from EWM at time of GR using SAP note 2894108, but this option is ruled out because, backflush is not GR dependent, business confirms backflush based on operation. We also cannot delivery based integration as we have integrated MES MII EWM as SAP EWM API for GI and GR provides better integration options.

Appreciate your reply

Shailesh Mishra

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Daniil
Active Contributor
0 Likes

Hi Shailesh, this is not so trivial to implement. Would be cool if SAP would implement it similar to cross-docking.

One way would be to trigger consumption from MES (FM /SCWM/MFG_CONSUME_ITEMS_EXT). It would be more standard way, and in a same or similar direction how SAP changes the process.

But if you do Backflush I see two options (both are possible to develop):

1. Prevent delivery creation and post GI directly in EWM instead (during the CORUPROC run)

2. Implement custom logic for GI posting (e.g. release stock from PMR + post GI)

I see option one as performance friendly, but it must be well designed on ERP Side as well, but it can be almost like Sync. GI in embedded EWM 🙂

Option 2 is just an EWM development, and from this point of view is easier, but it some adjustments for PMR should be done to have proper quantity/status.

Maybe juergen.pitz could add something to this topic.

BR,

Daniil