on 2022 Nov 15 11:03 AM
Hello,
Currently, I am using the `TransportationOrderConfirmation_In` Service to change a Freight Order - assign a Document Reference to it, as well as to change the confirmation status and it works fine.
The requirement is to do similar thing but with the Freight Unit - I have to assign the Document Reference to it. The above service is surely prepared to work only with the Freight Units according to the description and my testing. When I try to give the FU Number in the XML it returns an error saying that "confirmation relates to an outdated version of freight order".
What should I do to be able to assign the Document Reference to the Freight Unit accordingly as it happens in the example with the FO described above?
Thanks.
Request clarification before answering.
This Oss Note described what is supported with this service:
Other approach you can use is to update the Delivery with the "Reference" as field Text on Head Level and it will populate to FU in Notes tab (a customizing need between SD/MM to TM for Text) .
Regards
Rogerio
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Norbert,
Not sure about your scenario but if you are working in legacy system integrated with TM would suggest you use the Service "TransportationOrderGenericRequest_In" which is support by SAP in this case with external system.
If you need to insert the same Document Reference number, you're assign in the FO to all FU which are in same FO why not use strategy in this FO document type in order to update these FUs.?
Regards
Rogerio
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Am I wrong or the `TransportationOrderGenericRequest_In` service won't let me edit the Freight Unit? As I can see, currently it supports only the Category Type for the Freight Order.
The document I want to insert to the FU is different than in the parent-FO (or the FO does not even exist yet), so I don't think any of those solutions are suitable for my case.
User | Count |
---|---|
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.