Subcontracting by definition is a process which involves the procurement of a product from a supplier (the subcontractor) to whom the procuring entity provides components for the purpose.
Eg. A chemical manufacturer produces a chemical in bulk and sends it to Subcontractor who in turn fills and packs small containers of the chemical. These Small containers are the final saleable product..
Why map Subcontracting as In-house production?
Assume a situation where the Subcontracting vendor has multiple resources which are dedicated to your production site & you (as a Supply Chain Planner) want to perform capacity planning of those resources in SNP because you often get into capacity related issues like orders are getting delayed or re-prioritized and rescheduled with last minute notifications. Of course, there is an option available to you to analyze the capacity manually and set the priority to orders and keep changing them as you do not have visibility of capacity load. Would it not be great if you can model these dedicated resources in APO SNP to perform capacity leveling? Let’s explore how we can achieve this!
Master data required:
ECC:
APO:
Ways of working:
Benefits:
Challenges:
- Problem: In subcontracting scenario, generally end users are used to Purchase requisitions as an output of planning run. These Purchase requisitions are later on converted to Purchase orders as a part of execution. But when we map Subcontracting as in-house production, heuristics run creates SNP Planned orders. These planned orders should first be converted to Purchase requisitions and then only a Purchase order can be created. Thus this can be a point of resistance from end users as it will add one step to their manual work
- Solution: Use transaction MD14 (Single order) or MDUM (Multiple orders) to convert Planned orders to Purchase requisitions. Report “RMCVPLRQ” can be customized to convert Planned orders to Purchase requisitions in bulk using background jobs.
2. Vendor stock consumption
- Problem: It is quite possible that items like packaging material; labels etc. are supplied in bulk to vendor. So the stock of these items is maintained as vendor stock and replenishment of these items are planned via ECC MRP run instead of planning in APO. ECC MRP run will not net the vendor stock if the component demand is in form of “Depdem”. It will net only against “Subreq”
- Solution:
Either Plan component replenishment in APO where vendor stock is netted against Depdem as well as Subreq
Or
Change policy: Issue only limited stock to vendors. Remaining stock should be maintained as plant stock which can be netted against dependent demand
Or
Convert SNP Planned order to Purchase requisition in near term horizon Eg. 3-4 weeks. This horizon should be empirically decided such that it at least takes care of the lead time of subcontracting product
Key Points to remember:
Hope this information helps fellow consultants. Your comments are appreciated.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |