SAP Note - 1447497 Error message KI 260 is issued although this is incorrect

[Former Member]

Hi ,

Does anyone having the information related to SAP note - 1447497 and what is the significance of implementing this SAP note.

We are using SRM 5.0 & ECC 6.4

Regards,

Krishna

[Former Member]

Hi ,

Thanks for the reply,

While implemeting the SAP note - 1506897 , SAP Note - 1447497 got implemented automatically.

SAP Note - 1447497 - System issue error message KI 260 cost center is blocked during goods receipt.

Although we get this error if the cost center is blocked while performing goods receipt before applying the Notes.

so the question here is why SAP Note - 1447497 got implemented with SAP note - 1506897.

Please share if anyone is having any delta for this.

Regards,

[Former Member]

These two notes belong to different systems, check note number 1506897.

[Former Member]

Thanks Praveen,

But i have some couple of questions like :

1. In the symptom statement : The system issues error message KI 260 although this is incorrect  , why this is incorrect although system should give error if the cost center is locked,

2. Any information how to do the testing for this note.

Regards,

Dinbandhu Singh

[Former Member]

Hi,

The note is applicable only if you are getting the error message KI260 for correct data.

Regards

Praveen

[Former Member]

Hi Modi,

Go through the Symptom part of the note to find the significance of any note.

To check the whether the note is relevent for your system go to the

Correction delivered in Support Package section of the note.

Example your system component SRM_SERVER, Release 500 is support pack level

SAPKIBKS16, As per the note the solution is available in SAPKIBKS17. So you can implement the note for this case if you are facing the symptom of the note.

You can find the current support pack level by menu path system->Status->In SAP Sytem Data click on component version.

Regards

Praveen

Symptom 

The system issues error message KI 260 ("Cost center &/& blocked against direct postings on &") although this is incorrect (for example, during a goods receipt posting).