on 2012 Mar 30 6:17 AM
Hi guys,
I have a doubt in the following scenario;
| supervisor | limit (EUR) | ||
| Requestor | REQ | MAN_CC | 300 |
| CC manager | MAN_CC | - | 90,000 |
Here, the supervisor of the requestor (REQ) & the CC Manager is the same person i.e. MAN_CC
REQ creates a SC with value 5,000 EUR....Approval WF shown as below;
The approver step of Item value & Header value are clubbed together at Header value as the approver is same for both the levels. This is correct.
Now,
SC value changed to 5,00,000 EUR
But, now when the value of the SC exceeds 90,000 (limit of MAN_CC), still the approval flow has MAN_CC at the FICO header level.
Also the SC gets ordered successfully.
Is this a standard behavior or am I correct in thinking that after ordering the SC (value exceeded 90,000), it should have given a FIKO competency Error as there is no approver maintained with such a limit.
If this is a standard behavior, can you please explain the logic behind this.
Please revert.
Thanks in advance
- Ganesh
Request clarification before answering.
Hi,
If you buy above (>) 90,000 and there is no limit approver for it the workflow will error out.
Cheers,
Melina
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@Melina: thanks for the reply
so I'm correct in understanding that the workflow should give an error and SC can't be ordered if the value exceeds 90,000
but in my case the approval flow didn't give any error and SC was ordered
what could be the reason?
is there any loop hole in the workflow....if yes what can possibly be wrong with the workflow
f.y.i - I'm testing this scenario in Quality.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.