I recently worked on a project which involved investigating the possibility of getting rid of BDC on ME32K that was being used to create outline agreement. Now that the project is live i am writing this blog to share my experience so that others might use this alternative instead of using a BDC.In this three part blog i will discuss the scope of changes and how to go about implementing them.
Before proceeding with the steps outlined in this blog, I would highly recommend getting familiar with the attached SAP sourcing integration guide ( or get the latest one from sap support portal). Majority of the prerequisites are listed out this document. Moreover, the RFC:BBP_ES_OA_UPDATE is extremely slow for updates, as it need all outline agreement for processing event if you are not changing them ( more details in part 2 Roadmap to transitioning from BDC on ME32K to using RFC for service outline agreements - Part 2 )
Prerequisites:
I must say the process to transition away from BDC is anything but straightforward or intuitive and for us it involved tons of regression testing to finally get the exact same behavior as the BDC.
OSS Note | Description |
---|---|
1769023 | MEOUT 005: Item category 9 not supported |
1811870 | Heterogeneous behavior when publishing a Master Agreement |
1834156 | CCM: SE 377 during the creation of purchase order |
1866215 | ATC errors in MM-PUR application |
1906685 | CX_SY_CONVERSION_OVERFLOW in CL_BBP_ES_CONTRACT_UDPATE |
1953816 | S&041: External currency amount too big - unable to convert |
2002974 | CCM: Service item contains wrong condition information |
2015642 | VK 022: Inbound SOA failed with service items(s) |
2020259 | CCM: Incorrect condition item index for the supplement condi |
2023829 | Historic condition information are lost when CLM contract is |
2032941 | Header price conditions are not created for SAP Sourcing Master |
2127266 | CCM: Central contract change fails with an error message in |
2142004 | CCM: Scales not created for supplement conditions |
2142245 | Condition update for Info record result in program termination |
2155192 | CCM: Condition not updated for the newly added service items |
Note the TABLES parameters highlighted below, these are used to pass Service information (Service, texts, conditions, validity periods) during outline agreement creation.
SRV_LINE corresponds to data in ESLL table.
SRV_COND_VALIDITY corresponds to data in A081 table
SRV_COND corresponds to data in KONH table.
Logically when preparing data for calling the RFC: SRV_LINE should be filled followed by SRV_COND_VALIDITY followed by SRV_COND. The attached document shows the mapping between the structure fields ( of RFC parameters noted above) and SAP tables. I did use SRV_TEXT and SRV_COND_SCALE_QUAN but it should not be very difficult to figure out how they are mapped
The next part will cover the following topics:
Resources:
Integration Guide ( https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000270922012E ).
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.